Nintex Workflow

Hello Everyone,We have a requirement to put restrictions on date selection(Stage 3), if the user selects Internal/External in the Start form and Stage 3 has Board Approval Yes/No. I’ve had a look at the rules but could not find a way to put restrictions on the date. Attached screenshot for reference.If Internal + Board Approval Yes = Can choose any date If Internal + Board Approval No = Can choose next 30 working daysIf External = Can choose next 10 working days Thank you :)

On Nintex On-Prem / SharePoint On-Prem there was the possibility to add a Nintex Webpart to display all “My Tasks” on sharepoint page.Is there a way to do the same in SharePoint Online with Nintex Automation Cloud?I found this post within the Nintex GalleryNintex Gallery - Nintex Automation Cloud Web Part Solution StarterThis would quite fit my requirement. But I can only download the complete source and not the .sppkg file to add the spfx solutions to the sharepoint online app catalog.

HiI am using the Nintex Workflow Cloud platform to develop a form which is long and may take a few months to complete. I have explored the option of saving the form each time part of it is completed but the form needs to be completed in 30 days which isn’t possible for what is is intended for. Could this period be extended? If yes by how long? I have also explored the option of having the form offline but I can’t seem to find the option to enable form “Availability offline” from the form properties. I am using QA Nintex Workflow Cloud to test the workflow and then recreate in prod when it’s working okay. Please could you advise on how I can get the form offline. Also, how else can I configure the form to give me the ability to complete it over a long period of time. Thanks 

Hi, I am trying to figure out how to send out a notification anytime a field in a responsive form is modified. I tested this by  using a  the “SharePoint - Update list item” but it continuously runs and multiple notifications continue to push out… I don’t see within the conditions to select “modified date” anywhere. Is there another way to attack this?

I am working on establishing a standard process for deploying Nintex workflows and forms across Dev, Test, Build, and Prod environments, instead of relying solely on key-based exports. The issue with keys is that they have expiration dates and can expire before QA/UAT approvals are finished, and generating new keys doesn't align with compliance requirements for standard promotion procedures. To address this, I would like to use the Export/Import packaged workflow APIs. My preference is to export workflows as packages, store them in a Git repository, and then import them from the repo to higher environments as approvals are completed. I need assistance with saving the response from the Export a packaged workflow API (https://us.nintex.io/workflows/v1/designs/package/export) and importing it via API (https://us.nintex.io/workflows/v1/designs/package/import) into higher environments. i am having challenge of preparing query parameter and handling

PROBLEM: The “Get a file” action on my NAC SharePoint Online connector is returning:  Received an error response from the connector: {"message":"Not Found","correlationId":"9a0ef97e-588c-474c-91f2-384f1129140a","code":null}STEPS TO REPRODUCE:Defined a connector to my company’s SharePoint instance; successful [Connect] Uploaded an MS Word .docx to my SharePoint folder > “Share”, “People in my company”, [Copy link] Created an NAC workflow > [+Add step] > SP Online.Get a file >         Connection=MyConnection, Specify source by=URL, File URL=MyShare Ran workflow => “Not found”   <= No addtiional debug informationNOTE:  My company’s SharePoint doesn’t have an “Anyone” option to create the shareQ: What am I doing wrong?  How can I successfully read my .docx file from SharePoin

I’ve spent a good chunk of time in the pure RPA world before joining Nintex  and I’ve had to build a ton of these solutions. Bank Reconcilliations are one of the go-to use cases in the RPA world to show off value. Everyone’s done it. Everyone’s overcomplicated it.  With the new AI actions launched earlier this year in the Nintex CE Platform, comparing toolsets and Enterprise ProductsI’ve leveraged in the past this is the easiest, fastest and most importantly most accurate approach to Intelligent Document Automation and does not require any developer to get involved in the process.The build ProcessCreate a new workflow Add the Action Curate and Provide your AI prompt based on your requirement Add the additional logic in order to complete the workflow (convert the file from JSON to a document / save the file to SharePoint / manipulate the file format / make calculations / etc.)

My workflow is pretty simple:I have a starting form with a repeating section. My goal is to generate an Excel file with the data from the repeating section. When I run the workflow, the Excel file is generated with only one row, corresponding to the data from the first row of the repeating section. How should I proceed to get the other rows? Am I missing a loop? See attach, my template and the generated file. 

Hi everyone! We have something special coming soon 🎉We’re excited to open for registrations to participate in the Advanced Preview of the new AI-Powered Solution Designer, launching in December!Here’s what this new capability brings:🤖 Design complete solutions with Generative AICreate apps, workflows, and data tables in minutes instead of days — starting from a simple prompt.⚡ Accelerate how you buildGo from idea to working solution faster than ever, with AI helping you shape the structure and logic.🧩 Great for scenarios like: Employee onboarding Leave management Employee satisfaction surveys And many other internal processes 🛠️ What you’ll get as a preview participantEarly hands-on access to the Solution Designer and the opportunity to directly influence its fut

Feature Deep Dive: Table forms in Nintex Workflow Video: 1-minute intro to Nintex Workflow table forms.  Background:In June 2024 Nintex released Data (aka Tables) into general availability in Nintex Workflow following a 6-month Beta period. Nintex Data for the first time allowed workflow designers to consider storing business data inside the NW platform rather than relying on an external data store…common examples of those being SharePoint or databases. Alongside Data, workflow actions were added to a

I may be wrong about this, but I was hoping for confirmation on a possible change in the way hidden controls work. I know that if a control is directly hidden, it will not pass a value into the flow, but that doesn’t seem to have been the case if the control is visible but in a hidden group. For the past year, I’ve operated with the understanding that a control itself has to be set to visible to pass a value to the flow. Today, however, I noticed that a visible control in a hidden group no longer passes the value. It was a couple years ago when I was learning Nintex that I found out about how the visible controls in a hidden field work, and so I may have not fully understood it. So, I wanted to see if something has changed in the way a control’s value is handled from inside a hidden group.

I have a component workflow for which I want to move - dynamically names files from one folder to another IF a certain condition is met.  BUT I will not necessarily know the file ID but will know a part of the file name and the dynamic file folder.  So I tried query list to pull the Library in using  variable and I KNOW the folder and subfolders exists along with the file as an earlier branch has created them and I can actually see them in SharePoint.  BUT the workflow keeps saying the folder does not exist.Wondered if the query list was returning nothing and that’s the  cause of the failure.Oh and Retrieve item returns something but I cannot use it as a collection for a Loop for each action.

I am trying to Import Nintex workflow using API -  but the API error out Response status code does not indicate success: 500 (Internal Server Error). Detail error - StatusCode: 500, ReasonPhrase: 'Internal Server Error', Version: 1.1, Content: System.Net.Http.DecompressionHandler+GZipDecompressedContent # ===============================# Nintex Workflow Import Example# ===============================Clear-Host# --- Configuration ---#$apiBase = "https://us.nintex.io/workflows/v1/designs/package/import"$bearerToken = "dsfsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssstW"   # OAuth 2.0 token$packagePath = "C:\Ddsfffffffffffe.zip"  # Path to exported ZIP # --- Query parameters ---$name = "PSActivityReports_v3"$assignedUse = "Production"$overwriteExisting = "true"$publishWhenConfigured = "true" # --- Build URL ---$api

I have a repeating section in start form. In a Task Form, I want to display the row of data from the start form repeating section. And add an editable field for each row to get a status for each row.How can I do that?I understand that I can do a loop for each and get item from collection, but how can I have the data in my task form? 

I created a workflow using the Nintex Form as a start event. The workflow tested fine at the first attempt; however, subsequent attempts have produced a [WorkflowExecution.Semantic.Error] Semantic error(s) found.  See attached screenshot.I have used a ‘People’ control and ‘ConvertToString’ form variable to extract the email address from the collection.  This is the variable I have included in the ‘Assign a task to multiple users’ communication action.Can you assist in identifying the issue?  Not sure if this instance ID will help?Instance ID:0e3ac5fe-96a0-4061-a390-dd73a09b55fc_0_4

We have an application that we’re building and need to expose Nintex API data such as list of tasks assigned to the user for a particular workflow. I see that there are 3 authentication methods. We did not want to use service app token as it gives it access admin to the tenant and we didn’t want to use a personal access token either because of the developer role.  The client app token made the most sense because we can limit the scope to just read only to get the list of tasks. However, we noticed it requires a user to sign in through a pop-up window. Is there another method that won’t involve this pop-up window or is there a way to have the user only do it once? 

I have a form that uses URL parameters to prepopulate fields, using getQueryStringParameter. When I simply publish the form using the URL, this works fine.  But when I try to use the same technique with an embedded form and add those URL parameters to the src parameter of the iframe tag, it says "The form is Unavailable". Is there a trick to getting this to work?

This has probably been asked and answered before, but is there not a way to bring repeating section data over from a start form into a task form, and then add a field for the task assignee to complete?I’m developing an order form on which the initial user can use a repeating section to order items of equipment. After an approval process, the data is sent (via a task form) to the person who will fulfill the order. I don’t need this person to be able to edit any of the data from the start form’s repeating section; I just need a way for them to indicate the status of each item in the repeating section. For some items, they will be able to indicate that the item has been fulfilled because they have it in stock and can send it right away; other items will have to be ordered and then fulfilled later.I can bring over the repeating section data to the task form, no problem. But what I’d like to do is have a field (Choice - Single) for each item in the repeating section where t

I cannot seem to get CSS to apply to a repeating section.  I have the following within the Custom CSS:[dir] .nx-theme-styles .nx-theme-page {background-image: url(https://xxxxx.sharepoint.com/Style%20Library//Branding/img/imagename.jpg);background-repeat:no-repeat;background-position: center top;width: 100%;}.my_repeating {background-image:none; color:#FFEA00;background-color: #FFFFFF;}The background image works fine for the whole form but then repeats within the Repeating section itself, making the text very hard to see.  I add the “.my-repeating” to the CSS Class box for the repeating section and internal fields; I’ve also tried using ntx-repeating-section (without the dot) instead of .my-repeating within the Custom CSS but the form seems to ignore any custom CSS for repeating section:

did the feature get deprecated? don’t see under workflows. still see extensions

With the sample below, I'm getting a large JSON response. I need to extract just the names as an array so I can compare them with another string.In short, from the API response that lists workflows, I need to extract only the workflow names to compare them with another workflow name. Adding additional information-  I am using Query JSON and specially looking for JSONPath expression which return all workflow names . I am able to get one only - $.workflows[0].name{"workflows": [    {        "id": "ddddd-24c8-4ee4-af8f-gfhg",        "lastModified": "2025-10-27T20:39:57.054Z",        "name": "SSS Nintex WF",        "hasIDC": true

The Configure workflow option is a great way to set values for configurable variables (those whose “Allow external configuration” has been ticked). However, I could not access these variables in Start event forms, which kind of defeats the purpose.Is there a way to be able to externally configure variables that can be accessed in Start event forms?

must be missing some step. following the example add the JS-Insert Plugin.on the form add the controlwhere and how do I put in the JavaScript code? do I need to add the open and close script tagwhen I add some code keep getting Workflow cannot be loaded, saved or published at this time. anytime I have the atob() it will not saved. have the Load JQuery set to Yes works

Are you still using a password to access your Nintex Platform?We’re looking to better understand how our customers are authenticating today, particularly those who are using username and password sign-in rather than federated identity (SSO).If you’re currently using passwords to access Nintex Workflow or Apps, we’d love to hear from you. We want to understand: What’s preventing your organization from using federated identity (SSO) today? What challenges or requirements do you have around authentication and access? What would make SSO adoption easier for you? Your feedback will directly help us shape future improvements to identity and access in the Nintex Platform.If you’re interested in participating in a short interview please book a time to chat