Recently active topics

Is it possible to delete documents to remove them entirely instead of cancelling and having notifications flow to the signatories that have declined to sign the document?

Hi I hope you are well. I am building a Nintex form using Nintex workflow cloud and pulling data from salesforce. There is a data lookup to pull the data Type as a list. The end user would select a Type from the drop down and then the items associated with the selected Type would be displayed on the repeating sections. There are varied numbers of items associated with each Type selected. My questions are How do I design the repeating section to be dynamic ie number of repeating sections should automatically change to the number of items associated with the Type selected? If say Type A is selected and Type A has 5 items associated with it, I would like to have 5 repeating sections and each of the 5 items should automatically be populated on each row.  Please advise how to achieve this. Thank you

I have been using Nintex Cloud and build many workflows with it. I’m trying to workout one particular workflow and update the same in sharepoint on prem and it is weird that every time the item gets created without any issue. Once it reaches the update item I get the error “Received an error response from the connector: NotFound, ResponseStatus: Completed -”; I cannot understand why it behaves so only for this workflow as I have done the same steps in all my previous workflows. I am exhausted coz i have tried to make new connections, rebuild things but everytime it throws the same error. I had raised support ticket but to no avail. Any experts who can solve this issue so that I can make some progress in it?

Hello,I have a WF built in NAC that uses a Branch by stage action depending on 3 conditions. Under each branch I have condition actions looking for an amount, how many months and if a field is “ticked” to yes or no (boolean).If in the middle of the process an amount is changed, the stage would need to be exited and the instance would need to cycle back around and be reevaluated, conditions checked so that it can fall into the correct stage.I noticed that when I exit the stage to cycle back through, it falls into the same stage. Its like it continues to see the original values and not the new ones…How are new values that are updated in the form able to be recognized so that the instance will fall into the right stage?  

Hi, I am writing here hoping someone can help me or reference to some documentation.I am trying to recreate my site from a: SharePoint 2019 and Nintex 2019 → SharePoint Online and Nintex Automated Cloud.We have a lot of users +300 and many items in our list, +150 000 items. And we do not want users to see or be able to edit other items. But it is ok if they can see and edit other items from users from the same company.So, to avoid unique permission limit of 5000 items, we created one folder with unique permission for each company with contribute permission and set the list permission to read. This makes it so users can only see one folder and not able to add new item at root level. They click their folder and then the new item is available. and they can now add items and edit any item from their company.And we have a Nintex 2019 form for easier form design and functionality and so on. Now to SharePoint Online and Nintex Automated Cloud. I recreated the list with read permission and add

If I miss an update do I have to install all the CUs or just the most recent one?

Hi,Has anyone experienced issues where a form won’t load. It’s stuck with the Nintext Green Spinner of doom and won’t go beyond that.Restarted the k2 service and iis and still the same issue. Any ideas folks? 

For a while now we have been battling a problem with PDF rendering issues, the PDFs show empty boxes, irregular text formatting and also display of hidden controls and fields on the PDFs.We use the SaveAsPDF control on forms, then attach and send the PDF via emails.When the user opens the PDF. they see that the PDF rendering is misaligned and show empty boxes like this:These below should be hidden: We have a workaround which is to do a k2 service restart and iis reset, this fixes the issue for around 1-3 hours and PDFs are fine, but then the PDFs go back to be as above.We have a ticket in with Nintex for this, but just wondering if anyone else has come across this? I’ve searched the forum and checked pdf converter permissions, security etc etc. Added a pdfconverter.warmup delay in the k2hostserver.exe.config and also Installed service/fix packs. Any suggestions from the community would be appreciated.Kind Regards,

Hi everyone! 👋Nintex Apps 17.10.6 is live 🎉 Here’s what’s new. 🚀 Page Designer performance improvementsEnjoy better responsiveness and reduced lag when building and editing larger, more complex pages—making day-to-day app building smoother and more efficient.🎨 Design System Studio: Custom colors & gradientsTake more control over your app’s look and feel with the new Custom color option. You can now add multicolor gradients to better match your brand and design needs.Select Custom. Paste the gradient CSS into color input.Screenshot of a custom gradient in the Design System Studio🔗 Full release notes 🤖 Build faster with AIThe future of app building is here—starting with new AI-powered capabilities designed to help you go from idea to solution more quickly.  ✨ AI-Powered Solution Designer (Advanced Preview) ➡️ Sign up now Generate end-to-end Nintex solutions from a prompt, including Tables, Workflows, and Apps. Note: This capability exists on the Nintex Automation Cloud Experien

Issue DescriptionWhen you use the SPFx migration tool, you may encounter an errorError Message:The following error occurs: "System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Error converting data type nvarchar to datetime." with a site collection.”ResolutionThe fix is available in:Nintex Automation K2 (5.8) Fix Pack 25.Ensure you have the correct K2 version and/or Cumulative update installed. See KB001893 to see what Fix Pack level you have installed. Download the latest Fix Pack using the links in the table above for the version you require. Install the Fix Pack to apply the fix.

Issue DescriptionWhen you search for the Active Directory Group “K2 Administrators” in K2 Management to add it to a K2 Role, it does not display correctly, even though the group membership and functionality work as expected. The issue appears specific to this group, as other AD Groups display correctly.ResolutionThe fix is available in:Nintex Automation K2 (5.8) Fix Pack 25.Ensure you have the correct K2 version and/or Cumulative update installed. See KB001893 to see what Fix Pack level you have installed. Download the latest Fix Pack using the links in the table above for the version you require. Install the Fix Pack to apply the fix.

Issue DescriptionWhen you use the standard Worklist Control and add a filter for any date type (such as Task Start Date, Activity Start Date, or Workflow Start Date) using either a Relative Date or a Specific Date, an error occurs.Error Message:The following error occurs: “Unable to connect to server View Details.” After clicking on View Details:“Type: System.DateTime is not allowed for deserialization. trying to filter on any date”ResolutionThe fix is available in:Nintex Automation K2 (5.8) Fix Pack 25.Ensure you have the correct K2 version and/or Cumulative update installed. See KB001893 to see what Fix Pack level you have installed. Download the latest Fix Pack using the links in the table above for the version you require. Install the Fix Pack to apply the fix.

Issue DescriptionWhen you use SharePoint Subscription Edition and move a package between K2 farms using Package & Deployment (P&D), the event receivers do not transfer with the package.ResolutionThe fix is available in:Nintex Automation K2 (5.8) Fix Pack 25.Ensure you have the correct K2 version and/or Cumulative update installed. See KB001893 to see what Fix Pack level you have installed. Download the latest Fix Pack using the links in the table above for the version you require. Install the Fix Pack to apply the fix.

 Known Issue: SharePoint Database Migration with K2KB003714PRODUCTNintex Automation K2BASED ONNintex Automation K2 Introduction Use this article when you are migrating your SharePoint environment to a new farm, such as upgrading from SharePoint 2019 or 2016 to the SharePoint Subscription Edition. The guide helps you preserve the OAuth connection between K2 Five for SharePoint and your SharePoint farm by setting the correct SPAuthenticationRealm. ImportantBefore you begin, make a backup of your existing environment. Additionally before you migrate your SharePoint farm, obtain the SPAuthenticationRealm from your existing environment. When you create a new SharePoint farm, it generates a new SPAuthenticationRealm for the OAuth flow. This new realm disrupts the OAuth connection between K2 and SharePoint. To prevent authentication issues, set the SPAuthenticationRealm on your new farm to match the one from your previous farm.Obtain the SPAuthenticationRealm from the existing SharePoint 201x

Do you want to show master-detail information in a form and have it render automatically each time you change the master?  Repeating sections are your friend for this. The secret sauce is to set the default value of the repeating section to the data containing the detail line. “Default value?” I hear you ask.  “Surely that is only set when the form loads?” Well yes – every other control operates this way but we’ve tweaked repeating sections to re-render if the default value field changes.  This way you could use it to set up a repeating section with default values when the form loads but you can also re-render the repeating section if you change the default value. Read on for some examples of how to get this going. Example 1 – using a collection as a data sourceThe first example we’re going to use is by using a collection variable.  One thing you need to be aware of is if the collection variable is part of an object then it must be at the root level of the object.  If it isn’t then you

Hi All,I am using K2 Five 5.8 and have implemented the SmartActions feature.Is it possible to capture additional comment from the approver when completing a task via email?For example, approver respond the email:ApprovePlease proceed. The expectation is I can get “Please proceed” as the approver comment.This is similar feature with Nintex Lazy Approval feature. Thanks,Rizki

Hi there Is it possible to re-order the improvements portfolios as they show in the reporting screen? This is not our final list of portfolios but certainly wouldn’t want a general proposals section to appear first, would be more important for us to have non-conformances or health and safety concerns to show here but I can’t figure out if there is a way to adjust this order. Thanks! :)

Hi everyone! 👋Nintex Apps 17.10.6 is live 🎉 Here’s what’s new. 🚀 Page Designer performance improvementsEnjoy better responsiveness and reduced lag when building and editing larger, more complex pages—making day-to-day app building smoother and more efficient.🎨 Design System Studio: Custom colors & gradientsTake more control over your app’s look and feel with the new Custom color option. You can now add multicolor gradients to better match your brand and design needs.Select Custom. Paste the gradient CSS into color input.Screenshot of a custom gradient in the Design System Studio🔗 Full release notes 🤖 Build faster with AIThe future of app building is here—starting with new AI-powered capabilities designed to help you go from idea to solution more quickly. ✨ AI-Powered Solution Designer (Advanced Preview) ➡️ Sign up now Generate end-to-end Nintex solutions from a prompt, including Tables, Workflows, and Apps. Page Designer AI Assistant – Coming soonWe’re also hard at work on AI

We are looking at moving over to explicit process reviews so they are done at the same time every year. BUT, is there a way to disable the override default so that process editors cannot change this? 

I have an API (NWCToolkit Xtension,  base64encodefile) that returns two JSON elements: “error” and “result”: "Result": { "description": "Model for Result", "required": [ "error" ], "properties": { "error": { "type": "string", "x-example": "" }, "result": { "type": "string", "x-example": "SGV5IHdoYXRzIGdvaW5nIG9u" } } }, Since the workflow designer GUI doesn’t seem to have any way to differentiate “error” and “result”, I’m using the Query JSON action to parse the results.  Query JSON uses a JSONPath expression, and returns a Collection.Q: What JSONPath expression do I need to return a Collection with two elements: “error” and “results”?

I am currently working on a Business Process Automation solution using a SharePoint list, Nintex Forms, and Nintex Automation Cloud workflows. The process involves task approvals where approvers have three response options: Approve, Reject, and Request Clarification.I want to implement a Commentary feature using a multi-line text column in the SharePoint list to track interactions. Specifically, I need:Approvers to log their comments in the Commentary field along with a timestamp when responding to a task. If Request Clarification is selected, the Submitter (Responder) should be able to respond to the approver's comments in the same Commentary field, also with a timestamp. This feature should support multiple rounds of back-and-forth communication, logging all comments (approvers and responders) sequentially with timestamps in the Commentary column.I have already configured the approval and responder actions using the Branch by Stage feature. However, I need assistance with:Setting up

Trying to export processes that have variations and then import them into another tenant, but the variations separate out when importing them.Is there a way to keep them as variations?

A Salesforce security update removes the ability to send a Session ID in Outbound Messages, with enforcement scheduled for February 2026.Reference: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=005232763&type=1We currently use Nintex DocGen for Salesforce via Outbound Messages, which rely on the "Send Session ID" option for authentication. Will DocGen automations using the Outbound Message method break completely when Salesforce removes this Session ID functionality? Is there a specific Nintex DocGen for Salesforce package version that officially addresses this Session ID deprecation? Any alternatives?

TopicThis is a method of capturing and sharing basic network information that is sent and received by your browser. Nintex Support can review the network requests in these HAR logs for helpful information in our investigation.Note that Chrome and Edge sanitize HAR files by default (removing sensitive information) as of Chrome 130. Since Firefox currently does not do this, we recommend using Chrome or Edge for capturing HAR files.Instructions  Before reproducing the issue, right-click anywhere on the page and select “Inspect” (for Chrome or Firefox). For Microsoft Edge, click the “…” menu on the top bar and select “Developer Tools”Click on the Network tab and follow the necessary steps to reproduce the issue.Once the issue has occurred, click on the highlighted icon to export the HAR file (as shown below).Chrome:It's also always helpful if you can provide screenshots of the UI, with the issue/error highlighted.Attach the HAR file and screenshots in a reply to this case.Additional Inform