Product Forums

I followed the awesome AF deep dive video here: https://community.skuid.com/t/deep-dive-skuid-actions-framework and at 20:38 it takes us through logging activities with one-click.  Absolutely love it.I was then asked to allow our inside team to leave a quick blurb in the Description of the Task for what the voicemail was about.  How do we set a bunch of default values as demonstrated, but also have a pop up for the description field to show up as well?Create row in modelSet default valuesShow pop to gather additional information and attach to row created aboveSave row and close pop upHow do we attack this?Thanks

We have a client that has multiple apex controller classes linked to VF pages. The controllers use SOQL inner joins to create variable sets pulling data from multiple objects AND creates virtual fields for data not stored in salesforce objects. Does skuid allow the ability to access and display apex variables in a table? The code below is a simplified working VF page. It references an apex controller: PPL_Client_Account_Selection that does a join of a couple salesforce objects as well as defines a virtual field called: !account.selected that does not exist in any salesforce object. Goal is to use a skuid table that displays the controller variable data. The best that I can determine is that skuid tables utilize a model for displaying data and models can only reference Salesforce Object data and not an apex class variable. <apex:page standardController=“Portfolio_Proposal__c” extensions=“PPL_Client_Account_Selection”> <apex:form > <apex:pageMessages /> <apex:pageB

Is there any way to “refresh” a model/screen after a drop-down box option has been changed?  I have a template box that holds an image of the item displayed in a drop-down.  I’d like the image to change when the drop-down is changed, but the user has to save the model before it will update.  Any JS options maybe?

Hello Everyone,I created detail page that should simplify process of filtering candidates to project and assign them to long list.What I would like to do:1.Choose the project - it works2. Choose the candidate 3. Assign it to Longlist (In Salesforce is a object where are master detail relations to project and to candidate)I have problem because I made custom global action but it doesn’t work. I can choose candidate but any fields are populated.I am very new in coding so I would be very grateful if someone could point my mistakes:var params = arguments[0], $ = skuid.$;var $ = skuid.$;    var model = params.model,        list = params.list,        selectedItems = params.item ? [params.item] : list.getSelectedItems();var models = skuid.model.map();var Candidate = models.Candidate;var LL = models.LL; $.each(selectedItems,function(i,item){});$.each(selectedItems,function(){    var row = LL.createRow({        additionalConditions: [            { field: ‘Candidate__c’, value: this.Id, operator

Hey. For many pages we have, we need to let administrators have more control (edit, modify etc.) than others. We would like to do so in as maintainable, DRY way as possible.For a given page for which I want to apply variable permissions of what one can do (as administrator or normal user), the only way I’ve seen so far is to make two versions of the page, each assigned to different profiles. That will lead to inconsistencies in the future between the pages however, or we would have to copy paste new functionality between the two pages. That’s going to become a mess for sure.Is there a better way to go about this that someone knows about?Edit: Guessing one could use permission sets or somesuch in Salesforce? Don’t have much experience with that to tell.

I’m having a problem with users that don’t have admin rights being able to see a skuid page. The page is for an individual record.This is the error message I see:There is an implementation restriction on OpenActivities. When you query this relationship, security evaluation is implemented for users who don’t have administrator permissions, and only a single parent record may be evaluated. An unexpected error has occurred. Your solution provider has been notified. (skuid)I’m not sure what’s causing the problem.  We have one template field that counts the number of Open Activities related to custom object that has a detail to master relationship to the primary object on the page. However, when I remove that field from the page, we still get the same error.  Any advice is much appreciated.

We’re in the process of adding images to our pages using the file component tutorial outlined here.The other purpose of having these images is to merge them into a document a little further down the track, using one of the document generation apps.I’m just wondering whether the images stored on a field in an object (as a lookup to attachment) are stored with a public url? or are their security settings controlled by the object they are attached to?I’ve pulled up three related fields for an image using file component. I expect we would use the Url field to merge the given image into a document, but I just want to clarify whether this is stored as a public url or not, as I can’t seem to find that setting anywhere on the attachment.Any help appreciated. Thanks.

Trying to create a filter based on record owner (this is for the table of accounts on AccountsTab but should be similar for other objects). I have the filter set up like so: And I get output like so: As you can see each owner is listed multiple times. The weird thing is it does seem to work if I select a specific person, but the three problems are: 1) Obviously each name is repeated multiple times which looks very broken 2) There are many owners not represented at all3) Once I select an owner, none of the other owners are available for selecting. I have to go back to “Any owner” to make the other owners visible again. I guess because the rows in the model have been filtered so the entire list of owners is no longer available? So just wondering if there’s a way to get this working more neatly or if I have to create a manual source for each user which would be sucky to build and maintain. 

I have built a home page following the tutorial http://help.skuidify.com/m/supercharge-your-ui/l/117747-reclaim-the-salesforce-home-page. Everything is working perfectly - both when I view the page and when I navigate to the Home tab.I then added a Page Inlude (Company Calendar) to the page; which I have used on other pages and workes perfect. When I “preview” it everything comes in perfect. However, when I navigate to the home tab this is what I see: It doesn’t show my calendar at all. I have messed around with the query string but nothing I try seems to be working. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

I’m trying to make a mobile version of a series of Objects and (skuid) Pages that I refer to as the Portal. This portal uses Opportunities and 4-5 custom objects, and is used very often by our brokers and sales support reps. The first question I had, was do I develop this in Salesforce1 or Skuid mobile? I decided to do both! I love skuid’s ability to add custom actions, which Salesforce1 is lagging behind in. I can also reuse a lot of my Javascript from the desktop pages. I also love the way Salesforce1 looks, which (no offense) looks a lot prettier than skuid mobile. I am trying to use Salesforce1 for most of the look and feel, and use Skuid mobile for all of the custom actions that we use. My first question is, is this a good idea? Socondly I’m trying to add custom publisher actions as visualforce pages that redirect to my skuid mobile pages. I keep getting an ugly looking half page thingy that looks like this:How can I control the height? My VF page is simply a Javascript redirect t

I have a snippet which retrieves a DateTime field from multiple rows in a child model, converts each date to a string, and concatenates each date with a line break into a long text field on the parent model. (So that I can then send an html email template with this long text field included).Snippet below: var $ = skuid.$;<br> var parentEnquiry = skuid.model.getModel('CharterOpParent');<br>var parentRow = parentEnquiry.getFirstRow();<br>var Sectors = skuid.model.getModel('Sectors');<br>var descField = '';<br> $.each(Sectors.data, function (i, row){    //iterate over the rows<br>    var jsDateTime = skuid.time.parseSFDate(row.stack__Date__c);<br>    var jsDate = jsDateTime.toDateString();<br><br>    descField += jsDate + ' ';<br>    console.log(jsDateTime);<br>    console.log(jsDate);<br> });<br> console.

When model.removeRowById or model.abandonRow is called, the row.deleted event is not fired.Not sure if there should be a separate event (row.abandoned) or if row.deleted (possibly with an abandon flag) is appropriate, but would like to see some event visibility to round out the possible row actions that can occur.Thanks!

I am using sforce.apex.execute to call a remote service endpoint (this is within a sf community).  If I access the skuid page as a full page (with headers), then the remote call works as expected.  However, when displaying this page in a a vf popup page which includes the skuid:page component, the remote call fails with a 500 error.  I notice that the service address being called when it fails is not correct.  This is the endpoint being called: https://dataclover.force.com/services/Soap/package/CampaignWizardIt should be …force.com/auto/services…  Now, if I enabled showHeader=‘true’ on the apex:page so the headers how up within the popup, then the remote call works.  However, this obviously isn’t desirable since I don’t want that visual aspect.I do have the latest version installed since that was needed to fix an issue with page includes from the community.  I also cloned the three pages required for properly using the skuid:page component.

Fairly certain that this is not by design and an unintended side-effect but marking it as a question for now… When a row is retrieved on page load, it contains the fields defined on the model for that page. If the row was cloned, two items of note on the resulting data.row The row contains relationship fields as fully qualified properties on the root row object (e.g. data.row[0][‘CustomField__r.Name’] and data.row[0][‘CustomField__r’][‘Name’]) After a search of that field via a Field editor, the fully qualified version of the field is not updated so the fully qualified relationship property (data.row[0][‘CustomField__r.Name’]) does not equal the relationship object property (data.row[0].[‘CustomField__r’][‘Name’]). Fortunately, since the “__r” field always appears to get added to the row object first, when accessing data.row[0].CustomField__r.Name you end up with the correct value even though there are two property keys that match. Understanding that the recommended approach to access

I need to reference a parameter submitted via a post request that in turn renders a skuid page. If I use the approach of calling a visualforce page that includes the skuid:page component, I can initialize a javascript variable like so: <apex:page docType=“html-5.0” readOnly=“true” Controller=“NewCampaignFromMapController” showheader=“false” sidebar=“false”> <skuid:page page=“ServiceCampaignWizard”/> </apex:page> However, I would prefer to bypass rendering the visualforce page, and just call the skuid page directly. However, I cannot seem to find a way to get the IdArray parameter and initialize it within a snippet. I’ve tried using skuid.page.parameters.IdArray, but it comes back undefined.

when using a page include in a skuid page from the salesforce community, I am getting a 503 error.  The problems seems to be a malformed URL: https://dataclover.force.com/autoapex/include?id=70180000000NkFXAA0&isinclude=true&page=Camp…You can see here that the base domain …force.com/auto is the community url, but no ‘/’ is being added before the apex.  We are doing the page include through a queue action, so as far as I see there’s no way to make any adjustments to account for this.  Please help.

Not a big deal at all.  I know how to defaut a datetime field to Today (that is awesome)!  Is there a way to default the date to blank like normal but the time to PM instead of AM.  It removes one click for our users.  Not huge, but thought I would ask.If not, I can say I tried.

I have a script that uses a custom popup with a page include. The page include shows on my windows PC as seen in the attachment.  However, the included page is missing when viewing on my ipad.  Also, how do I remove the “Done” button in the bottom right corner.

If I want to pass the string with a value “History” in the parm “View” in a URL of View=History&id_Closed={{Id}}&Add_CR_Doc_Id={{{$Model.CR_Closed.data.0.CR__r.Id}}}Something must be wrong as conditions do not work.

Ok. My dynamic click to call with call log popup is working great. Just a few refinements and it’s good to go. One of those things will be to add the necessary code to grab the id of the field even if the field is not in the model.Now to keep things easy to manage on the call log interface, I’m going to keep the page include page. Otherwise I’d put it into the popup XML string. That said, I’d like to be able to dynamically create the necessary models to support wherever the user clicked from on the phone number.OwnerId is no problem Whatid is no problem AccountId could be tricky as can be applicable when whatid is Accout, Opportunity, Contract, any child of the Account, or if whatid any other object but whoid is contact, then the contacts accountid is used Whoid is a lead or contact. If a lead then whatid is null So, assuming I can gather the appropriate Ids from the click to call side, is it possible to dynamically create the necessary model for the whatid from javascript with nothing

I have a page with a model with a condition that is filterable and on by default with a hard-coded default value. I have added a table to my page, using that model, and a filter on that table that can alter the value of the model’s condition. However, when I use the “Create a 'Filter Off” option’, that condition’s value does not turn off, it just returns back to the default filter value of the model. Is this intentional? Is there a way to disable the condition when the filter option is all/nofilter?

I’m trying to move my object tables over to Salesforce, but I keep getting an error message: stating that there are 3 failed components, all of which have the following error messages: There is already a Child Relationship named on File. I can’t find these existing child relationships. Can anyone help?

as per title.I use console.log.What can I do within the console? What are it’s limits in terms of inline javascript debugging? Can I add breakpoints? Can I restart it with alterations within the console? etc. etc. etc

Any way to render a row action button in a table only if the row’s drawer is open?