Skuid NLX, SFX, & EXP

This is really a minor problem, but I thought it should be noted. The Apps list that comes as part of the user menu only shows 7 apps (even though I have about 15), and it doesn’t show them in the order that I’ve specified in salesforce.

I have a skuid page with multiple tabs and I want to render and display tabs based on the permission set assigned for the current user,Is there a way of doing this? or any alternatives?Thanks In advance

Maybe this discussion is already out there, but it’s hard to search because of all the stuff about merge syntax…I’d like to merge Contacts on an Account. Salesforce has this functionality natively, how do we do it with Skuid?

I’m using a table and the action framework to replace what List Views and the Mass Update / Mass Edit appexchange package used to do for us. One drawback is that I can only work with 50 records at a time instead of 200 like I used to, any way to show more than 50 rows in a table?

Here are a couple of screen shots that show some things that may not be as intended. First, is what is shown when connecting to our service, DataDirect Cloud, which makes various data sources OData-compatible. When connecting via Lightning Connect, this is displayed as simply “Customers”, while here it’s “jdbcEntities.dbo.Customers”. This screen shot shows a collision amongst various fields and labels when the External Object Name exceeds a particular length. Not the end of the world, but FYI.

Minor bug.To reproduce:Open any page with a model.Click on the model’s name to collapse its fields, conditions and actions. (works)Click on the model’s name again to expand it. (fails… nothing happens).If you happen to have another model on the page, and click on that, and click back to your first model, it will expand as expected.

I’m attempting to render a number field as a picklist.Here’s what I’ve got so far:var field = arguments[0], value = arguments[1], $ = skuid.$;  field.metadata.picklistEntries = [        { value: 30, label: ‘30 minutes’, defaultValue: false, active: true },        { value: 60, label: ‘60 minutes’, defaultValue: true, active: true } ]; field.metadata.defaultValue = 60;    skuid.ui.fieldRenderers.PICKLISTfield.mode; }It’s working, sort of.With the defaultValue line I was trying to eliminate the “none” option, but I’m still getting “–None–” by default.Is there a way to eliminate the --None-- option?The values are returned as strings. Not sure if there’s a way to change that so that it outputs numbers. If there’s not, I can handle it on the other side with Number().Thanks!

I have a formula text field It works fine until I use it in this scenario. It show like this:

Our clinic calendar is built up of 30 minute appointments from 9 am to 6 pm. When an appointment is created, it is related to a clinical user on our org. Is there a way to list available appointment slots - that is, appointments that have not been scheduled?It could act kind of like the inverse of an aggregate model on the scheduled appointments.PS - Banzai rocks my socks

With all of the new configuration aspects in Banzai (model services, etc.), what are the recommended best practices for deployments/migrations?Thanks!

Have been playing around with External Data Source (specifically OData based) and ran in to several issues which in some cases resulted in my pages not even able to display in the builder any longer and requiring a “revert” to previous version.Here’s some high level information and feedback:1) Initially when using the “External Object Name” field I thought it was just a straight text box so I typed in the value, saved the page and previewed but saw no data.  It wasn’t intuitive to me that this was a “autocomplete” as each time I typed nothing changed so I just assumed it was a straight textbox.  I then decided to hit refresh and noticed that what I typed was gone which led me to determining that this must be an autocomplete field.2) After figuring out that it was an autocomplete, I still was not getting any data but had no indication as to why.  I wasn’t sure if the service was configured correctly, or if I was using the wrong name for the model, etc.  Possibly some messaging even if i

When pulling in data via an OData service, only the first row of data is displayed in a table even though the model contains all expected rows. I’ve narrowed this down to only seem to occur when an “Id” equivalent type of field is not included in the model. For example, using the OData test service at (http://services.odata.org/V3/OData/OData.svc/) with ODataDemo.Categories, if the model contains “Name” only, the table only displays the first row. However, if the model also includes “Id”, all model data is displayed in the table. In either situation however, the model itself contains all rows as you can see in the screenshot below with the footer indicating 1-3 of 3 rows. Not sure if this is expected behavior (if so, a doc updated might be appropriate) or a defect? Screen Capture Steps to repro: create necessary OData setup for http://services.odata.org/V3/OData/OData.svc/ Add model to page choosing the service and specifying Name field only Add model to page choosing the service an

When placing a navigation component on a page, the display of drop-down menus gets “cut-off” based on container height, etc. Placing the nav component in the “header” and the problem does not occur. One solution to this is to ensure that the container has a minimum height of what the menu would need but this is not ideal. I’m guessing the problem has something to do with the zorder and/or the js/css implementation. Note in the screen cap below the menu should display the entire SFDC Apps menu. Steps to repro: Create new blank page Add nav component and set it to dropdown for any of the options Preview Sample Page XML <skuidpage unsavedchangeswarning="yes" personalizationmode="server" showsidebar="false" showheader="false"> <models></models> Thanks!

After Banzai install, one of our pages, that has a page include, loads with the page include shifted way to the right. See pictures: Chrome… loads just fine. Firefox ESR 31… page include (or maybe just the table component) is shifted IE 11… shifted as well. Any ideas?? This is only since Banzai was installed.

I have a custom object that is a child of another custom object. I am trying to pull a table that would have all of the childs custom objects on the account not just for one parent object. For example we have a subscription custom object that has a child custom object that is called admin request. This is used to allow our sales team to request something that only an administrator can do. I would like to create a table that pulls all admin request for the account even if there are multiple subscriptions on the account. I know that I need to create a condition that does that but cant find the correct combination to work. I can either pull for one of the subscriptions or for every admin request in our system. I just want to pull all admin request for that clients account no matter how many subscriptions they have. I am new to Skuid Please help.

Record Types for objects that should not be available for a user profile are visible in picklists and table filters.I’ve come across the problem in several places in Skuid, most recently I built a table filter that uses Rows in a Model as the values, and the model is RecordType with a condition of SObject Name = Contact. A user that has no access to the Contact Record Type of Shareholder can see the Shareholder option in the Table Filter.This also happens with field editors when the Record Type field is a picklist, all users can see all record types that are available except those limited by filters, even if they don’t have access to a particular record type. It throws an error on save if the user chooses a record type they don’t have access to, but I’d prefer if they just didn’t even see the unavailable record type option.

My pages in Banzai have a ! where my icons used to be.  They are there when I preview the page, but not in the page builder.  Do I need to do something to get them to show up? 

Our story begins with 2 models:“Members” : ordinary custom sObject model, condition where Id = Param.Id. Limit 100 records“UtilityAccount” : custom sObject, condition where Id IN any row from "Members: model. Limit 1000The trouble is that users weren’t getting warnings for bad data on page load if the error was on row #101 or greater. So I changed the limit on “Members” to 1000 records. Life was great in Userville, the page load was a drop slower but Users we’re so excited that they got errors on page load, that they barely noticed. Suddenly the Apex Heap size error reared it’s ugly head. Users were frightened and disturbed by this. Anytime there were more than 500 or so “Members” the page wouldn’t load!Enter the loadNextOffset method! This was added to the API recently, and I immediately spun up a snippet as detailed here: https://community.skuid.com/t/options-around-managing-large-datasets-and-apex-heap-siz… . Now my “Members” model loaded incrementally and all was peaceful.But then

In the “OData Use Case…SQL Server” tutorial, you detail how to add a new data source and define a Model Service for this OData endpoint. However, you say in Step 2 of “Create new Model Service” to define it as “REST”, not “OData1-3”. Why is that? Given that it’s an OData endpoint, seems logical to set the Adapter Name to “Odata1-3”, which is presented in the popup.Thanks,Greg

I’m currently building in a workflow to check for duplicates before converting a lead.  To do so, I have a duplicate leads model whose conditions compare fields like email address to the same fields on my Lead model.  When duplicates are identified, they are presented in a table along with a separate table containing values from the current Lead record for comparison.  Both can be edited in-line to clear up any errors that might be causing the duplicates to be identified.  I then have a custom Save button that saves and re-queries both models.When editing and saving the duplicate record in-line, the process works perfectly.  The value is updated, the models re-queried, and the tables disappear from the page (they’re conditionally displayed only if the duplicate model contains any rows).  However, when the current Lead is edited in-line, the models are saved correctly, but the query does not seem to update the Duplicate Leads model, as this continues to be displayed in the pop-up, despi

I currently have a row action for opening up a popup when the item needs to be shipped. Instead of the small icon for row action I want a button “Ship” to show up in its own column which when clicked will run the action added for row action. I am able to show the button in a separate column using custom renderer for a field, but not sure how to trigger the row action from that snippet. 

I am passing “close_top_window=no” in the query string I have 2 different headers that can appear in the included page. I am rendering as follows:https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B409lhd9sYDcVnFUU1RPSjJ0ZWM/view

I have a table with rows from a model with order product records belonging to a specific order. In standard Salesforce functionality, clicking on the “Product” field in the order product related list takes you to the order product record. I want to emulate this behavior with the PriceBookEntryId lookup field of my Skuid table row (that is, linking to the order product (the rows record Id) instead of the pricebookentry lookup record). I have tried the method from this thread but it doesn’t appear to work (even removing the link does not work, perhaps this method was broken by Banzai?) https://community.skuid.com/t/is-there-a-way-to-selectively-override-remove-a-lookup-fields-link/124 Is there any way to override the lookup fields link so that it targets the rows record id instead of the related pricebookentry? This applies only to the lookup field in read mode, I’d like to use search fields and lookup filters on the pricebookentry object while in edit mode. Example: This product link g

I just upgraded my Sandbox account to the new Bonzai RC to test it out and every time I edit a Skuid page I get the following error:SObject row was retrieved via SOQL without querying the requested field: skuid__Page__c.skuid__MasterPage__r

I’ve read up on the Mass Record Creation tutorials posted throughout the community but noticed that I couldn’t find anything on having this process work from a basic "Create New ___ " Page. It seemed to me that the majority of the tutorials focused on Mass Record Creation within an account, etc.First off, I was wondering if it would be difficult to create this type of functionality but from a basic record creation standpoint. So a User would fill out all pertinent Opportunity information (maybe have a field for the # of those records to be created), and then when they clicked Save (or another custom button likely) that multiple records would be created identical to the first and then save. I say this because we were using In-Line cloning to mimic this process; however, the initial page query takes ~5 seconds given all the extra fields it has to load. And many of our opportunities are orders broken out into 6-12 months so I don’t want to take that functionality away from our users if po