Nintex Automation K2: Back to basics
Access resources, discussions, and troubleshooting tips to build custom applications and streamline workflows with Skuid NLX, SFX, & EXP.
Recently active
Hi,Looks like there’s a bug with merge Syntax in REST Models. It doesn’t seem to work for nested fields. E.g. {{subscriptionId}} works {{rateplan.productId}} does not, even though it is an option to choose from in the template editor.Any ideas?
I created a Visualforce Tab for my new homepage, in order to completely replace the Salesforce home, problem is that I have a Navigation component in my header that pulls from “Salesforce Tabs for Current App” which includes the standard Salesforce Home link.Is there a way to hide this while keeping the user’s tabs and order?
Hi all,Quick question: is it possible to set all links on a Skuid page to open in a new tab without using a Javascript snippet? Is there a setting I’m overlooking somewhere?Thanks!Kathryn
I have a model with some inactive conditions (filter default off.) The user activates these conditions, sets values, and re-queries the model using a snippet we wrote to do some multi-model filtering which is run using a “Search” button. The results are displayed in a table, and the model limit is 200 records.That all works fine. Since we upgraded our environment to the latest Skuid version, when the user clicks the export under the results table, the conditions get deactivated and the user gets a bunch of records that they shouldn’t be.We have the export set to “attempt to load all records before exporting.” Before the upgrade, the model conditions would “stick” but now it appears to be deactivating all the conditions that are “filter default off.”
I am attempting to have ti so that when you click on an item in a queue it moves to the top of the queue. I have created a checkbox on my object called Pinned (pinned__c) and have the following queue item actions:Show Message and Block UI Update a Field on Row (Pinned__c=TRUE) Save Model Changes Query Model Unblock UI Run Snippet (the snippet performs Update Page Include) The model is sorted by Pinned__c. The box will show as checked on the Page Include, but not on the queue (so the selected item in queue doesn’t go to the top).
In certain circumstances the renderer logic on a component is using the wrong model. In my example below, the page has separate models for a case and a child case, both of which are of object type Case. The button “Enable if Child Case Status set to Changed” has a renderer that should enable it when the status of the row in ChildCase model is set to “Changed”. That’s not working. If anything, it seems to be looking at the Case model instead, which is also what I observed in the page that led me to trace down this issue. If you set the Parent and then the Child, then the button is enabled - but I’m pretty sure it’s looking at the Parent. In the example, the Page Title component is using the Case model. If I change it to the ChildCase model, then the renderer works. However, the renderer is supposed to be cross-object and in my real usage I need to be able to assess both the parent and child case for rendering logic in the same set of buttons. <skuidpage unsavedchangeswarning="yes" pe
Hi,I’ve got multiple areas in my pages where I would like to show the chatter feed for different rows in a table either through popups or drawers. Would anyone know how I can do that so that it shows the chatter for the row in context and not just the first model row? Also i have developed my own UI so would like it to appear as it does in Skuid not Salesforce.thanks
Hi,Prob a very basic question, but I use the snippet below to highlight text field in a table and for some reason it causes the Apostrophe to turn into “&#39;”From what i found on another post, I have to use the unescaped value, but not really sure how to do that 😦In case anyone can help, Here’s snippet:var field = arguments[0], value = arguments[1];skuid.ui.fieldRenderers[field.metadata.displaytype]field.mode;field.element.css({‘background-color’:‘red’,‘min-height’:‘30px’});Thank you
Getting a console error and blank page. This is on an opportunity. We use Account as a ‘borrower’ record related to an Opportunity via a join object. This error only occurs when the Account’s record type is Borrower Entity, but not when it’s Borrower Individual. We don’t have any time-related conditions based on these borrower accounts. Any ideas?
i have a requirement to show list of plans (a custom object, but we can also think of it as pricebookEntry). Against each plan, there should be a button “Select” which should get ticked as soon as the user click on it. Any ideas how do i bring a button against each row of my table. And that too, the button should display the name “Select” and whence click, it should show a tick mark kindof thing.
Hello Everyone I stumbled across a squite painful problem. I built a skuidpage which calls a apex to send mails upon buttonclick. It all works perfectly fine in Sandbox, but we pushed it to a live org and it just plain out fails i get this error in the console: the Apex looks as follows: public class SendMailsToParticipants{ @InvocableMethod static void SendMails(List<string> emails) { static void SendMails(List emails) { String eventId = recipients[0]; Event e = [SELECT id FROM Event WHERE id = :eventId]; recipients.remove(0); List<messaging.singleemailmessage> mailList = new List<messaging.singleemailmessage>(); for(String recipient : recipients){ Messaging.SingleEmailMessage mail = new Messaging.SingleEmailMessage();mail.setTemplateId([select id from EmailTemplate where developername='EventUpdatedEmail'].id);mail.setTargetObjectId([SELECT id FROM User WHERE id = :recipient].id);mail.saveAsActivity = false;mail.se
I’m getting this error from a line in a script:Uncaught TypeError: jsloopStartDateTime.getDate is not a functionfrom this line:var jsloopStartDateTime = skuid.time.parseSFDateTime(loopStartDateTime);jsloopStartDateTime.setDate(jsloopStartDateTime.getDate() + 7);Any tips?Details: this script has run perfectly for months until 8/26. I tried updating to the current version of Skuid, but it didn’t address the issue.
I am creating a New Record. I created a condition to set the DateTime field to Today. My end users tell me that it used to show todays date and current time. It is now setting the date to Today’s date but the time is always showing 12:00. It makes sense that Today is not Now() and thus would set the date but not the time. But I am told that it used to do both (I honestly don’t remember if it did or not but multiple users claim it did). Regardless, it would be cool to add NOW() as an option on DateTimeFields. Is there a best case way of setting a datetime field to Now() but allowing any date or time to be entered if necessary. Thank you!
Hi, Weird issue that just started today as far as I can tell I have some fields with workflow rules, that basically timestamp the field each time a new note is added + another WF that emails the record owner when a new note is entered… Used it for years now, all was fine. Now today on certain fields and only on certain records it stopped working… no rhyme or reason… Example: on same record 2 different fields with those WF rules (1 rule for each field). If i input a note in both fields, one will execute the other will not… On other records both will execute… so for sure it’s not a validation error or something similar… Really lost at this point on what to do next In case needed here’s formula’s criteria i use for timestamp: and( ISCHANGED( Discussion_Notes__c ), LEN( Discussion_Notes__c )>0 ) THIS ISSUE ONLY HAPPENS WHEN ON SKUID. If I overide back to standard detail view and add a note, all works as it should… It looks like when using skuid, for certain records only,it does no
We were having an issue with conference rooms or vehicles being overbooked because we did not have the duration of the appointment listed on the calendar. The calendar does have a duration in minutes that just lists total minutes but it did not look as nice as having 1 hours 35 minutes. etc. So what is the best way to convert Duration in Minutes (a standard field) into hours and minutes.
Can’t seem to wrap my head around removing the Standard header from our HomePages. Our new layouts include custom headers & footers. It’s a bit tricky for us since each User/Admin group for each department has a different home page, so we’ll have to use page assignments since not all departments are getting the new layout yet. Issue: I created a new VF page using <apex: page> and set headers & sidebars to false. When using this config even with HP components & layouts the headers still weren’t removed. I tried a few other VF page configs yet to no avail Current Solution: I used the discussion from the below link(s) to create a custom Home_Page tab & I set this to be the default page to load with the app. Since we really only use one app, this would effectively override the home page. So I can change the default app to load for the department Except that the standard ‘Home’ still exists and would still direct users to a home page that includes both standard & c
Hello,I have created automatic table filters on a page, and I noticed the “Apply” button does not show up as visible. Any help troubleshooting this is much appreciated.
Hi I have a custom object whose View action is overridden by a Skuid page. When I turn on lightning experience, the page renders slow, but it renders, However it displays the VF page name on top of the page. In classic, it does not display on the page. Is this by design? How can I remove that from the page? We have other override for standard objects using VF page, the VF page title does not show in Lightning experience. Another issue: there is double scrollbars on the page for the custom object. Only 1 scrollbar for the standard object override VF Skuid page.
Skuid Team, I’ve just helped a client upgrade to Rockaway and I think we’ve found a problem. In many of our pages we have models set up to support creation of related records (as in creating a new Account when creating a new Opportunity). For these models, we select the option to “Create default row if Model has none”. In Banzai we had no issues whether we actually added a new related record or not. With Rockaway, we’ve found many of these pages won’t save due to an error ‘Required fields are missing:[field name]’. It seems that Skuid is trying to save the related record model even though we have not issued a ‘Save’ for that model. The workaround is to uncheck the option “Create default row if Model has none” and create the row as part of the button that opens the pop up for the related record. While this works, it means tracking down every page where this situation exists. Here is the error: Here is a page that demonstrates this error. To replicate the issue, just enter a name,
We are trying to invoke a skuid page when viewing an account page of a specific record type, SkuidPage for only a specific profile. So we tried a couple of visualforce pages to override the View action for Accounts. The first one we tried that redirects to a skuid page <apex:page standardController=“Account” action=“{!redirect}&actionType=View&objecttype=Account” extensions=“skuid.Redirects”/> </apex:page> The result is correct for system administrators. The account’s with record type SkuidPage gets the skuid page while other types of accounts get the standard Salesforce view page. However, users with the profile who needs to see the same skuid page only gets the standard Salesforce view page no matter what Skuid page assignment we tried. We then tried embedding the skuid page on the visualforce page. <apex:page standardController=“Account” showHeader=“true” sidebar=“false” showChat=“false” readonly=“true” docType=“html-5.0”> <skuid:page page=“SkuidPage” ac
We have a skuid page within a service console. The skuid page is a list of oppportunities we hoped to be filtered by an account. I tried to pass the account id by creating a detail button on the account page that invokes the service console. Below is the onclick Javascript I used.location.href=“/console?tsid=02u22000000CmVc&id={!Account.Id}”;The skuid page within the console has a condition where the opportunity accountid is equal to the the id page parameters.The button invokes the service console but its seems like it’s not passing the id parameter from the URL to the skuid page within the service console.
The screenshot below should explain it, but every so often when loading pages part of the body gets pushed up into the header for some reason. I’ve tested this with and without Sticky Headers and it seems to not change anything.https://cl.ly/2C071h1O3d28
Hello, I am creating a page to help our staff check information in our system again supporting documentation – the documentation is basically PDFs and images in a related Attachments list. What I’d like to do is to place the document and the fields to review side by side, on the same page, to facilitate review. The way I tried to set this up was: I created a model called ClientApplications that pulled the fields to be reviewed from the Salesforce record (filtered by ID from the page URL). I created a second model called ClientAppAttachments that contained all attachments where the parent ID was the ID of the record in the Attachment model. Finally, I arranged my model fields on the left side of the page and created queue on the right side of the page to list out all of my attachments. I tied this queue to a page include component with model type Attachment and action type View. Basically, I think I followed the instructions here: Page Not Found — Skuid v15.1.6 Documentation Layout: Qu
Hello, My apologies if this is a silly/obvious question, but I am trying to add a field that’s not in my table to the Mass Update action pop-up. More detail: I have a model (let’s call it Contacts) that has fields A, B, and C queried from the Salesforce object. I create a table with fields A and B as columns. I offer a Mass Update action on my table. Currently, when the user selects the mass update option, they see a pop-up that allows them to edit fields A and B. I would like them to also see / have the option to edit field C in this pop-up. I have explored creating my own “Mass Update” action using a pop-up, several UI-only fields, and a page title button that does field updates on the selected rows … But I was just wondering if there was anything more straightforward that I could try out first. Thanks! Aparna
Hello! I am creating a case desk for our org. Many of our cases have attachments and child cases, so one thing I’m doing is creating a table of “Parent” cases with drawers that open to a list of child cases and related attachments. I would also like to offer users the option to add an attachment or create a new child case from inside the drawer, so that they don’t have to open each parent case record to do this. The way I’ve set this up is: I created a model called Cases for all of my parent cases, a model called CaseDetails for the drawer, and models called CaseDetailAttachments and CaseDetailChildCases for the related lists inside the drawer. I configured the filters, before load actions, and context per the documentation here. Page Not Found — Skuid v15.1.6 Documentation So far, the load is working beautifully – meaning when I open a drawer or multiple drawers, the correct list of attachments and related cases shows up. However, the issue I’m running into is with the Create New Cas
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.