Nintex Automation K2: Back to basics
Connect with peers and experts to ask questions, share insights, and find solutions for Nintex products.
Recently active
i have 5 sections like application,contact, employment, parties, collateral. after filling those fields details for those objects in skuid, employment and collateral details are not saving.can any one help this…?
using skuid , whenever i select pick list field, based on that picklist field i need to edit the another section field. can any one help with this. thanks in advance…
I have conditions set on two different models and when I inspect the element I get SOLQL Limits 21 and SOQL Limits 301. Does anyone know what it means?Example:soql: “SELECT OpportunityId,Opportunity.Name,Name,TeamMemberRole,OpportunityAccessLevel,UserId,User.Name,User.SmallPhotoUrl,Opportunity.OwnerId,Opportunity.Owner.Name,Opportunity.Owner.Id,User.Id,Id FROM OpportunityTeamMember LIMIT 21”
I’m working on improving a visualforce community. 1. Currently the favicon is just the cloud part of the Salesforce logo. I would like to change that somehow. I uploaded an icon as a Salesforce static resource. But it doesn’t seem to be working. Can this be done through Skuid? 2. Since implementing a custom header, the browser tab names just display the url of the page. Which is kind of ugly. Previously it displayed the name of the community. Anyone know how to fix this? Thanks!
HI, I’m trying to change the color of the text from only a couple specific fields , which are mostly in Edit mode by default… I created a CSS with guideline found in community… and am not able to make it work Here what i thought should have work: .nx-fieldtext { color:#ff0000; } And ofc added the name in th css class on field I need to change color on. But it did not work I’ve even followed the examples here: http://help.skuidify.com/m/25162/l/102515-including-custom-css-in-a-skuid-page using the inspect element. I’m a noob when it comes to that, but it seems pretty straightforward this is the element styles when i click on specified field trying to apply this css If i change the color on it directly (the green color is default from theme) or use the following , as seen on console, directly in css class: .nx-field input, .nx-field textarea, .nx-field .nx-richtext-input { color:#ff0000 } The color is applied to All my large text fields Can anyone point me in the right direction pls? Thx
Is there a way to truncate/round an average field in an Aggregate Model? I want to show two decimal places via merge syntax in a rich text area. I tried to use a formula field, but I had two problems: The ROUND function rounds to the nearest integer (no decimals). The formula fields don’t seem to respect the metadata settings for decimals (see below) Here are my formula field settings: (field should only display two decimal places) (just a copy of the AVG() function from the aggregate model. And here’s what I get in runtime:
using skuid , whenever i select pick list field, based on that picklist field i need to populate another field. can any one help with this. thanks in advance…
How to do it ?
We have steps in the wizard that we want to be conditional based on field values. So for instance, we have Step1, Step2, Step3 and Step4. Step2 would only display if a field called Status = Hold and if not then Step1, Step3, and Step4 would be the only steps?
Added a Multi-Picklist field to the SF User object for “Country__c” which the user works/handles. I made a RunningUser model like suggested in other conversations, that pulls the current user and the Country__c field fine. Trying to add a condition to another model to restrict records to the countries selected in the users Country__c field, as below. Comparing a Single item picklist to a multi-picklist. Works fine if the RunningUser Country__c has one value selected. If I select multiple, the condition always fails. (All objects get filtered out) With multiple countries selected, the model and queue is empty: With just one, the model loads and the queue displays: As a test, I made the model condition on a hard-coded set of values and that works fine with single or multiple: What am I missing? Thanks Seth
My users are getting INKED:You’ve been INKED! (Something went wrong)We were unable to find a Skuid Page named AppointmentQueue. The Page is either inaccessible or does not exist. If you believe you should be able to view this Skuid Page, ask your System Administrator to check the Sharing Model for the Page object to ensure that you have access to this Skuid Page.7.27.1 installed.Users have skuid licenses and page viewer permission set.Page exists.Seems that only users who are System Admins can access the page.???What am I missing here?
Looking for help with logging AJAX proxy calls via sforce.connection.remoteaction. How can I see what is being sent to the external server? Also, should there be any issue with using URL parameters with this sforce.connection.remoteFunction? Like this: sforce.connection.remoteFunction({&nbsp; &nbsp; <br>url : "https://domain/page?param1=xxxxx&amp;param2=xxxxx",<br>&nbsp; &nbsp;onSuccess : function(response) {&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; alert("Success! result:" + response);<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; console.log(response);&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp;},&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp;onFailure : function(response) {&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; alert("Fail! result:" + response);<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; console.log(response);<br>&nbsp; &nbsp;}&nbsp;<br>}); When I call the URL via the browser it appears to pass the url parameters
Here’s the field setup: Here’s the condition: The runtime url is: /apex/skuid__ui?page=OptimizeHeader_RN&staff=**********RAAQ (an actual salesforce id) But the value in the model at runtime: The condition is getting passed the name of the url parameter instead of its value.
I am creating a subquery on an aggregate model that has to go through three relationships for the join relationship. (For example I am on object A but I need to pull the ID from Object D.) I tried hacking the XML with the aggregate alias names but that didn’t work. Can anyone see what I am doing wrong? I am using this subquery in a filter. The filter works properly on other tables but not this one. The two difference are this is a aggregate model and the subquery goes back so many relationships. Here is my subquery:
I’m getting the blue spinning wheel on all my rich text boxes on one of my pages. Any idea what’s causing this?
In a Field Editor I want all the required fields to be red. Can someone let me know how I would go about achieving this?
We have “The load model data on page load” set to False on the model because we want the users to use the filters first before they see the data. The problem we are facing when the filters are persisted and users comes back again the data is not loaded even though all the filters are properly set. Is there any way we can check and see if the filters are set then load model data on page load is set to True?
Is there a way when using the action framework to control via a snippet when the subsequent action will execute, particularly when the snippet involves asynchronous processing?For instance, one of the simplest ideas would be something like: var MyModel = skuid.$M(‘MyModel’);<br> MyModel.updateData( function(result) { // tell action framework to go to the next step } The idea being that we wait for the async process’s callback to be called before moving to the next step, rather than simply moving on after the (in this case) updateData method has been invoked but (indeterminate, but most likely) before it has completed.
I have a javascript button working fine.Now I want to check some skuid fields before weather they are empty .If they are filled only then the javascript button should work.Here is my code var applicationModel = skuid.model.getModel(‘Application’);//alert("applicationModel "+applicationModel);var applicationRow = applicationModel.data[0];var appId =applicationRow.Id;var stat=applicationRow.;var agree = confirm(“Are you sure ?”);if (agree){ */I want to check fields e.g genesis.application.status__c is empty or NOT */ var retVal = sforce.apex.execute(“DemooOrgUtils”,“borrowerAccepted”,{app:appId}); alert(“retVal”+ retVal); window.location.reload(); }
I have an Opportunity table with multiple conditions to it. Can I populate thee chart based on the table condition, in other words can i populate a chart based on the records displayed in the table?
I came across a bug with on-click actions and charts. Essentially, I have a Pie Chart with Multiple Data Series defined, and each Data Series has its own set of corresponding On-Click Actions (as seen below). The On-Click Actions for each Data Series are set up similarly: Show message and block UI Activate a Model Condition Requery that Model so that the Table below Filters appropriately The bug is: regardless of what Data Series I actually select, the On-Click Actions always register as if I selected the First Data Series that I’ve defined. I’ve noticed this behaviour in two separate charts now, where Each Data Series in the Chart is supposed to Activate a corresponding Toggle Filter on a related Table (based on a boolean field). How can I define On-Click Actions for Multiple Data Series and have each one work correctly?
I’m looking for a solution for a simple document uploader for non-users. Ideally I would have a button on a record detail page that creates a URL that contains a couple of parameters that I would use to route the upload. The URL would be pasted into an email and sent to the non-user. The URL would open a force.com public site that would display a Skuid page. The Skuid page would have an upload component connected to a model and set to chatter feed. The model would have a condition where record Id is equal to a page parameter. What should happen is that the non-user would click the link they receive in an email and be presented with an uploader. Any documents they upload would be uploaded to the chatter feed of the record populated per the URL parameter. I’m pretty sure I could get that working (plus or minus a tweak or two), but my question is would the uploaded document be public? Would the record in the model be public? I want access to the uploader to be public so the user doesn’t h
I created a page to “view” a record. The page looks fine, but no matter which record I choose to view, it always loads the data from the same record. So if I try to open record 122, the information displayed is for record 121. What am I missing?
A mass action on a table of type "redirect to URL" My url is: [root]/PostInvite.aspx?productionMode=false&reviewName={{{Name}}}&reviewEmail={{Email__c}}&reviewSMSNumber={{Primary_Phone__c}}&sendType=sms ... etc. But the url that's getting sent is: [root]/PostInvite.aspx?productionMode=false&reviewName=&reviewEmail=&reviewSMSNumber=&sendType=sms ... etc. The merge syntax isn't being processed. The values are definitely in the model, as they're showing up in the table.Help?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.