Nintex Automation K2: Back to basics
Access resources, discussions, and troubleshooting tips to build custom applications and streamline workflows with Skuid NLX, SFX, & EXP.
Recently active
This is a fork of the issue at https://community.skuid.com/t/table-limits-record-retrieval-to-11-000-records-in-a-table-…Currently, models are limited to 10,000 rows due to the use of the Standard Set Controller and it’s limit of 10,000 records (https://developer.salesforce.com/page/Paginating_Data_for_Force.com_Applications).Standard Salesforce tabs are capable of going beyond 10,000 rows of data.Would like to see support added for allowing more than 10,000 rows in a skuid model.Thanks!
I have a table that will have millions of rows. I built a stock Tab page for the object and started clicking “load more.” Unfortunately, when the record count got to 11,000, the load more button disappeared and there was no indication that more records were available.I can understand that there are some reasons why limiting the number of records in memory in a model would be desirable. That said, having no indication that there is more could lead to business decisions being made (e.g. think Inventory tables) that would be wrong (e.g. oh, we must not have any more widgets, time to go buy some).Questions:1) Why did it stop allowing rows to be retrieved2) Why did it not give any indication that there are more records even if it wouldn’t allow more to be retrieved?Steps to reproduce1) Put a lot of records in any object (e.g. hundred thousand or so)2) Build a stock tab page for the object3) Preview page4) click load moreExpected BehaviorAll records in object are available for loading OR
Historically, I think the solution that has been most commonly implemented is to use a 2-step Wizard Component in a Popup - documented here: http://help.skuid.com/m/components/l/102570-the-wizard-component-create-new-contact-wizard Main benefit for me was that I could use a single multi-action button, instead of needing the Wizard component. Plus, the compact size and look of the multiselect picklist feels like a slicker Ux choice to me, depending on the use-case. Video Example: XML for a Page that can be used as a Template: built on top of Skuid’s Sample Page “ProductsTab_SkuidForCRM”: https://bitbucket.org/snippets/mB-RomanMelnik/6jp4A There are a number of annoying required fields and model conditions that I quickly hard-coded to try & make this work with the standard Products/Pricebooks objects - but I highly recommend playing with this in your own junction objects instead. So ignore the bottom 2 models: You can also safely ignore the Action Framework settings on the “Product2
I have a ui-only formula field with a return type of checkbox and the following formula: {{$Model.PrenatalVitamins.data.length}}\>0 When the PrenatalVitamins model has data, this works. When there is no data, When it doesn’t, it fails with a javascript exception and won’t load the page. Here’s where the code fails: Seems like skuid is expecting to look for a field value, instead of the ‘length’ property of the row? But I don’t really know. I just know it’s not working. 😉
Is it possible to filter my results from the Search Component by a field value from a model? Here’s my feeble attempt:
Hey Skuidsters - I’d love to sort the returned values for the search based on a field value. Use case specifics1. A phrase object has a rollup field that counts how many times it has been used 2. Sorting the search results would bubble popular options to the topIs this possible?
Row Actions have it, Global Actions have it, Mass Actions have it but views must have drawn the short straw.Would like to see conditional rendering added to Table views.Thanks!
Custom Views have long been a feature of Skuid. Unfortunately, the documentation for them has not kept up with the great enhancements that have been made to the core product. For example, there is no documentation that describes how to invoke row actions, mass actions, global actions, etc. Additionally, nothing about how to retrieve the column information specified in the builder, etc. To truly make custom views powerful, harnessing all these goodies is required. There’s even a way to specify which types of elements should be emitted (e.g. table vs div, tr vs td) yet no documentation around this.Would like to see the documentation on Custom Views updated and enhanced to reflect current Skuid functionality. Thanks!
Conditionally applying CSS would be less intimidating if Skuid did the work. If there were an action for “apply CSS” and an option in the conditional rendering section for “apply CSS” I think it would make things like “make font red it this field says x” much easier and more frequently used.
Would be nice to have a possibility to assign variables on pages where a user can input a value that can be referenced on the page. Particularly - on dashboards, to have a field with “goal” variable that user inputs and formulas reference to calculate % of attainment. I hope this makes sense. this would be a huge advantage over standard SFDC dashboards. thanks. (not sure if this exists and I just dont know about it, in that case - please point me to the answer)
Currently, there are different colors for toggle filters to show whether they are active. It would be great if other filter types had similar functionality. When a user comes back to a view (that uses saved filters), the active filters would be highlighted with a different color so they would know not all records are being displayed.…paying attention to actual filter labels can be a lot to ask 🙂
Is there a way of using a Month View in the Calendar Component such that the current week is the first row? So rather than a calendar month, it’s the current + next 3 weeks?
I’ve seen this in several other posts but not in a way that emulates standard SF list views. Just seems like a no brainer.Now I know that filters can be set to remember what was used last, but SF list views provide the ability to save the filter criteria and name them for quick access in the future.
As per title. Otherwise it seems possible to show sidebar without the header.
Row action on a table is "Redirect to URL’ with a url of: /apex/skuid\_\_ui?page={{PurposePage}}&id={{Id}} Here’s the data in the table’s model for the row: Here’s the url that’s opening: /apex/skuid__ui? page= &id=a0R1a000001fyuSEAQ PurposePage is a ui-only text field that I’m populating with a custom field renderer on Interaction_Purpose__c; Does the merge syntax for the action process when the table renders, instead of when the action is clicked? This may be related to: https://community.skuid.com/t/mass-action-redirect-to-url-not-processing-merge-syntax-9ak…
Similar to Matt’s post, but more a control hub for fields. Similar to Page Assignments.I’d like to setup additional rendering options assignment rules by field API name, field type, by User, by Profile, by Role and/or by Record Type to set default rendering option.I’d like to be able to add additional options by snippet.
Barry reminded me with his post of this idea I forgot to post.There are times when a table/chart has all the records that would be in the results of a subsequent search. This can be determined under the following conditions:Existing conditions are unchanged. Model isn’t flagged as having more records available. Upon activating another condition, such as setting a filter on a table, the model/table results would then be instant. Great user experience.
This stems from the issue at https://community.skuid.com/t/choose-a-lookup-field-value-from-new-records-that-exist-in-… and specifically Ben’s post at https://community.skuid.com/t/choose-a-lookup-field-value-from-new-records-that-exist-in-…. Use Case: Model ‘B’ has two fields that are lookups to ‘A’ & ‘Z’ respectively. The user can create new records in ‘A’ and ‘Z’ on the same page that records in ‘B’ are being created. Multiple model ‘B’ records can reference the same ‘A’ and/or ‘Z’ records. The user needs the ability to search for field values on ‘B’ record for records that exist in ‘A’ (or ‘Z’) either in the client (unsaved) or database (existing records). Currently, reference fields only support “searching” for existing records. Table filters have “manual” sources which provide some pieces of this. Unfortunately, the “manual” modes must already be loaded in order for the records to appear as options in the filter (which is not ideal when dataset is large). For the use ca
Based on Jared Jones’ idea for the collapsible wrapper component.Collapsible field editor sections should expand and collapse when the label or title is clicked, not just when the little arrow is clicked.We are running the ‘desktop’ skuid pages on large tablets, and the little expand collapse arrow is just too small. We’ve had to create our own ‘collapsible’ editors with pagetitle buttons and conditional rendering.
Currently, formulas are evaluated near the end of the “create new row” process. The result of this is that formula field values are not available to use when setting default values, etc.In thinking this through, from a technical perspective, as soon as the “row” object is created, the formula fields exist and therefore should have a value. During the “create new row” process, updateRow is called in a few different places for different reasons (e.g. setting default values). UpdateRow processing will evaluateFormulas as well but if a formula relies on a formula, the value wouldn’t be calculated correctly.This stems from Bill’s post at https://community.skuid.com/t/ui-field-formula-to-return-current-time.Couple of questions:1) Was placing the evaluateFormulaFields near the end of the createRow process intentional?2) Does it make sense to make this call sooner in the process?Thanks!
There are times where I’d like to reset all the conditions on a model. I know I could do this using a snippet fairly quickly, but the snippet wouldn’t be dynamic for use in other models.
Similar to override field metadata, it would be useful to be able to override the sObject label that models pull in and is added to the footer with a custom label. I know its possible to hide with CSS, but changing this label would be helpful.
Skuid should support nested merge syntax- i…e. merge formula within another merge formulafor example:{{$Model.recModel.data.0.redirectURL}} where redirectURL field value is /{{$Param.baId}}I am not able to do this currently. Please let me know if I am missing anything.Thanks!
I realise that there isnt a calendar available for the mobile builder yet but I tried using a calendar lightning component instead - but had no joy? https://appexchange.salesforce.com/listingDetail?listingId=a0N30000000q4PvEAI I used the workaround ie added a lightning component (markup://flexipage:recentItems) and then in the xml changed the component to mvc__calendarcomponent … and also tried calendarcomponent Any tips as we really need a calendar on the application?
Hi GuysI want to have a filter with the source rows in a model and filterable default on. As I created this filter, everything worked fine. Probably it stopped working with the upgrade to Rockaway. I’m working on a sandbox with version 8.8.On my dev org, I had Banzai version 7.31, so I tried it there - worked fine. After upgrading this org to Rockaway, it stopped working again. XML: {{{Name}}} {{Id}}
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.