Product Forums

Hello Everyone I stumbled across a squite painful problem. I built a skuidpage which calls a apex to send mails upon buttonclick. It all works perfectly fine in Sandbox, but we pushed it to a live org and it just plain out fails i get this error in the console: the Apex looks as follows: public class SendMailsToParticipants{ @InvocableMethod static void SendMails(List<string> emails) { static void SendMails(List emails) { String eventId = recipients[0]; Event e = [SELECT id FROM Event WHERE id = :eventId]; recipients.remove(0); List<messaging.singleemailmessage> mailList = new List<messaging.singleemailmessage>(); for(String recipient : recipients){ Messaging.SingleEmailMessage mail = new Messaging.SingleEmailMessage();mail.setTemplateId([select id from EmailTemplate where developername='EventUpdatedEmail'].id);mail.setTargetObjectId([SELECT id FROM User WHERE id = :recipient].id);mail.saveAsActivity = false;mail.se

I’m getting this error from a line in a script:Uncaught TypeError: jsloopStartDateTime.getDate is not a functionfrom this line:var jsloopStartDateTime = skuid.time.parseSFDateTime(loopStartDateTime);jsloopStartDateTime.setDate(jsloopStartDateTime.getDate() + 7);Any tips?Details: this script has run perfectly for months until 8/26. I tried updating to the current version of Skuid, but it didn’t address the issue.

Hi, Weird issue that just started today as far as I can tell I have some fields with workflow rules, that basically timestamp the field each time a new note is added + another WF that emails the record owner when a new note is entered… Used it for years now, all was fine. Now today on certain fields and only on certain records it stopped working… no rhyme or reason… Example: on same record 2 different fields with those WF rules (1 rule for each field). If i input a note in both fields, one will execute the other will not… On other records both will execute… so for sure it’s not a validation error or something similar… Really lost at this point on what to do next In case needed here’s formula’s criteria i use for timestamp: and( ISCHANGED( Discussion_Notes__c ), LEN( Discussion_Notes__c )>0 ) THIS ISSUE ONLY HAPPENS WHEN ON SKUID. If I overide back to standard detail view and add a note, all works as it should… It looks like when using skuid, for certain records only,it does no

I am creating a New Record. I created a condition to set the DateTime field to Today.  My end users tell me that it used to show todays date and current time.  It is now setting the date to Today’s date but the time is always showing 12:00.  It makes sense that Today is not Now() and thus would set the date but not the time.  But I am told that it used to do both (I honestly don’t remember if it did or not but multiple users claim it did).  Regardless, it would be cool to add NOW() as an option on DateTimeFields.  Is there a best case way of setting a datetime field to Now() but allowing any date or time to be entered if necessary.  Thank you!

We were having an issue with conference rooms or vehicles being overbooked because we did not have the duration of the appointment listed on the calendar.  The calendar does have a duration in minutes that just lists total minutes but it did not look as nice as having 1 hours 35 minutes.  etc.  So what is the best way to convert Duration in Minutes (a standard field) into hours and minutes.

Can’t seem to wrap my head around removing the Standard header from our HomePages. Our new layouts include custom headers & footers. It’s a bit tricky for us since each User/Admin group for each department has a different home page, so we’ll have to use page assignments since not all departments are getting the new layout yet. Issue: I created a new VF page using <apex: page> and set headers & sidebars to false. When using this config even with HP components & layouts the headers still weren’t removed. I tried a few other VF page configs yet to no avail Current Solution: I used the discussion from the below link(s) to create a custom Home_Page tab & I set this to be the default page to load with the app. Since we really only use one app, this would effectively override the home page. So I can change the default app to load for the department Except that the standard ‘Home’ still exists and would still direct users to a home page that includes both standard & c

Hello,I have created automatic table filters on a page, and I noticed the “Apply” button does not show up as visible. Any help troubleshooting this is much appreciated. 

Hi I have a custom object whose View action is overridden by a Skuid page. When I turn on lightning experience, the page renders slow, but it renders, However it displays the VF page name on top of the page. In classic, it does not display on the page. Is this by design? How can I remove that from the page? We have other override for standard objects using VF page, the VF page title does not show in Lightning experience. Another issue: there is double scrollbars on the page for the custom object. Only 1 scrollbar for the standard object override VF Skuid page.

Skuid Team, I’ve just helped a client upgrade to Rockaway and I think we’ve found a problem. In many of our pages we have models set up to support creation of related records (as in creating a new Account when creating a new Opportunity). For these models, we select the option to “Create default row if Model has none”. In Banzai we had no issues whether we actually added a new related record or not. With Rockaway, we’ve found many of these pages won’t save due to an error ‘Required fields are missing:[field name]’. It seems that Skuid is trying to save the related record model even though we have not issued a ‘Save’ for that model. The workaround is to uncheck the option “Create default row if Model has none” and create the row as part of the button that opens the pop up for the related record. While this works, it means tracking down every page where this situation exists. Here is the error: Here is a page that demonstrates this error. To replicate the issue, just enter a name,

We are trying to invoke a skuid page when viewing an account page of a specific record type, SkuidPage for only a specific profile. So we tried a couple of visualforce pages to override the View action for Accounts. The first one we tried that redirects to a skuid page <apex:page standardController=“Account” action=“{!redirect}&actionType=View&objecttype=Account” extensions=“skuid.Redirects”/> </apex:page> The result is correct for system administrators. The account’s with record type SkuidPage gets the skuid page while other types of accounts get the standard Salesforce view page. However, users with the profile who needs to see the same skuid page only gets the standard Salesforce view page no matter what Skuid page assignment we tried. We then tried embedding the skuid page on the visualforce page. <apex:page standardController=“Account” showHeader=“true” sidebar=“false” showChat=“false” readonly=“true” docType=“html-5.0”> <skuid:page page=“SkuidPage” ac

We have a skuid page within a service console. The skuid page is a list of oppportunities we hoped to be filtered by an account. I tried to pass the account id by creating a detail button on the account page that invokes the service console. Below is the onclick Javascript I used.location.href=“/console?tsid=02u22000000CmVc&id={!Account.Id}”;The skuid page within the console has a condition where the opportunity accountid is equal to the the id page parameters.The button invokes the service console but its seems like it’s not passing the id parameter from the URL to the skuid page within the service console.

The screenshot below should explain it, but every so often when loading pages part of the body gets pushed up into the header for some reason.  I’ve tested this with and without Sticky Headers and it seems to not change anything.https://cl.ly/2C071h1O3d28

Hello, I am creating a page to help our staff check information in our system again supporting documentation – the documentation is basically PDFs and images in a related Attachments list. What I’d like to do is to place the document and the fields to review side by side, on the same page, to facilitate review. The way I tried to set this up was: I created a model called ClientApplications that pulled the fields to be reviewed from the Salesforce record (filtered by ID from the page URL). I created a second model called ClientAppAttachments that contained all attachments where the parent ID was the ID of the record in the Attachment model. Finally, I arranged my model fields on the left side of the page and created queue on the right side of the page to list out all of my attachments. I tied this queue to a page include component with model type Attachment and action type View. Basically, I think I followed the instructions here: Page Not Found — Skuid v15.1.6 Documentation Layout: Qu

Hello, My apologies if this is a silly/obvious question, but I am trying to add a field that’s not in my table to the Mass Update action pop-up. More detail: I have a model (let’s call it Contacts) that has fields A, B, and C queried from the Salesforce object. I create a table with fields A and B as columns. I offer a Mass Update action on my table. Currently, when the user selects the mass update option, they see a pop-up that allows them to edit fields A and B. I would like them to also see / have the option to edit field C in this pop-up. I have explored creating my own “Mass Update” action using a pop-up, several UI-only fields, and a page title button that does field updates on the selected rows … But I was just wondering if there was anything more straightforward that I could try out first. Thanks! Aparna

Hello! I am creating a case desk for our org. Many of our cases have attachments and child cases, so one thing I’m doing is creating a table of “Parent” cases with drawers that open to a list of child cases and related attachments. I would also like to offer users the option to add an attachment or create a new child case from inside the drawer, so that they don’t have to open each parent case record to do this. The way I’ve set this up is: I created a model called Cases for all of my parent cases, a model called CaseDetails for the drawer, and models called CaseDetailAttachments and CaseDetailChildCases for the related lists inside the drawer. I configured the filters, before load actions, and context per the documentation here. Page Not Found — Skuid v15.1.6 Documentation So far, the load is working beautifully – meaning when I open a drawer or multiple drawers, the correct list of attachments and related cases shows up. However, the issue I’m running into is with the Create New Cas

Hi,We’re displaying 10 account models on a single page.  All the models have been pre-filtered based on a customer segmention value.  This works fine, but we’re having trouble determining how to apply additional filters to all 10 models (global filters).  The user may continue to filter the accounts by a number of additional fields (Sales Rep, Region, Gross Margin, etc.) so the solution here which suggests hardcoding values in the condition(s) isn’t feasible.We’ve also tried the example in the cross-object conditions post, but again the example is based on hardcoded values.  How do we pass a value selected in one filter into the value field on conditions on other models?  That seems to be the part we’re missing.  Thanks!

I have created a 2 column division, in column 1, I’ve placed a section header name, but in column 2, I don’t want to place text for the header name, but I want the header to have the same height as the header in column 1 as if there was text in it. Is there some CSS I can place in the Section Title box that would allow me to do this?

Hello everyone,I’m attempting to add a Suggestion Box to a Skuid page and I’m receiving a strange error message as seen below:Vote Type being blank I assume is just a UI issue between Salesforce and Skuid since it’s a button in Salesforce. I tried to replicate that promote vote button using the Run Multiple Actions - Vote: Create new row(s) > Type: Up.Any ideas?Thanks!

I have an Invoice detail page that has a tab showing the invoice line items in a table. There are two tables for invoice line items rendering based on a field on the invoice. Here is where it gets weird…I can see the line items but other users can not. Some of these other users have the same permission and profile as me. I have sys admin permissions. Things I have checked:Ensure the rendering condition is not specific to me. That other users can see the line items in SF standard view Permission to field that the rendering is based on. checked model data in the console while logged in as another user to ensure the data is populating. Let me know if any other information would be helpful. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

Sounds like a silly question, but I’m hoping to get an idea on how custom headers/footers could affect page performance. And I don’t know enough about Master-Child page relationships even speculate. I’m aiming to build a fairly intricate header & footer which mainly includes direct links to our documentation articles & current reports; however, I didn’t want to build this out only to realize it’s slowing each individual page load.I just added a bunch of direct links which makes the page 1,100 lines but I haven’t noticed any slow performance. Just wanted to get an idea on whether this could become an issue towards 2,000-2,500 max.

Seen some related references on this subject but something I’m missing.I have 2 aggregate models, lets say Accounts and Contacts. I have 2 Accounts charts that drilldown fine. From the 2nd chart I want to pass the drilldown context to the Contacts chart, which is on the Contacts aggregate model. Not seeing how to do that.Ex/ So my 2nd chart is showing all Accounts in East that are Inactive. When I click chart slice I want that context to go to Contacts so I see all Contacts in those same Accounts.I saw some references to the Highcharts API stuff, which is foreign, but even with that I don’t get how you’d use that merge syntax, if that’s what’s needed, in the drilldown options…or am I supposed to be using a filter condition instead? If so, still confused how to pass the correct context.

It would great to be able to use Skuid to freeze/unfreeze users when deploying changesets instead of having to mess with the dataloader.  I created a table on a Skuid page with the UserLogin object for the data model.  For some reason, however, the UserID column is blank.UserIDs show up fine when using this query in the developer console:Select Id, UserID, isFrozen from UserLoginAnother example of Salesforce protecting us from ourselves?

Hi I’m trying to delete a row conditionally in Javascript:    resumeModel.abandonRow(resumeModelRow);     resumeModel.save();This deletes the row in Skuid, but not from the salesforce database. Has anyone done this successfully? Thanks!

I have a  field as Editable. The field is automatically populated with the value when the page is loaded. I have a condition to make filed readable using javascript. If the condition  satisfied, the field changed to Read only but the value disappear,  Below is the code to make field Readlonly,var modRef =skuid.model.getModel(‘PayInv’); var rowRef = modRef.getFirstRow(); var f = rowRef.Refunded_Amount__c; console.log(f);    if(newD !== dateString)    {         f.readOnly = true;    }I am wondering why the value disappear when the field changed to ReadOnly ? I would be glad if any one could help me with this.

The action “Row in Model updated” is only working the first time the model is loaded. If you change the page or select a different item from the filters, it does not trigger the “Row in Model updated” action. What can I try here? Thanks in advance!