Upcoming Event - Nintex Automation K2: Back to basics
Connect with peers and experts to ask questions, share insights, and find solutions for Nintex products.
Recently active
Hello,I’ve got a wizard in which the navigation button calls a couple action sequences back to back.However, I’ve discovered that if I have a validation rule fire or a required field throw an error on the save that is in the first action sequence, the second action sequence is still invoked - and even the navigation at the end of the flow. So the error flashes, but it bypasses the save, and proceeds with now incorrect data.Any idea how to get around this? I’ve played with different approaches but they all move forward in the flow. Btw, I’ve seen posts on this regarding js, but this is pure skuid wizard/action sequence config.Any thoughts?Thanks,Paul
No parameters are passed to a snippet used for conditional rendering a field. er … uh …
We are implementing salesforce matching rules and duplicate rules. We found skuid is not handling alert properly. comparing with salesforce native ui, there is list if matched duplicated records and option to ignore (as matching rule config). But in skuid error message doesn’t handle ignore and save, and there is no indication of matched records. Screenshots attached
It would be convenient for our users if there was a ‘today’ button or link in the navigation section of the calendar component (in all three views) when the current date was not visible.
As per subject! Anywhere a user can call a snippet action there should be parameters available.
Enjoy!(function(skuid) { /* ========== Custom field type-specific renderers here ========== / var $ = skuid.$; function defaults(field){ $(field.element).dblclick(function(e) { e.stopImmediatePropagation(); return false; }); $(‘a’,field.element).attr(“target”, “_blank”); } function customBoolRenderer(ogRenderer, mode, field, value) { // To call original renderer ogRenderer.apply(this, Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 2)); defaults(field); } function customComboRenderer(ogRenderer, mode, field, value) { // To call original renderer ogRenderer.apply(this, Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 2)); defaults(field); } function customCurRenderer(ogRenderer, mode, field, value) { // To call original renderer ogRenderer.apply(this, Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 2)); defaults(field); } function customDateRenderer(ogRenderer, mode, field, value) { // To call original renderer ogRenderer.apply(this, Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 2)); defaults(field); } function customDTimeRe
Because of this: https://community.skuid.com/t/model-condition-rich-text-field-null-not-working Skuid should not allow us to select textarea fields for conditions on salesforce data sources.
Building on this idea - where you have two buttons, and each one stores a specific table layout and lets users switch back and forth: https://community.skuid.com/t/snippet-to-show-hide-set-of-column-in-tableLet users arrange a table however they want (reorder and show/hide columns), then save that layout, give it a name, and be able to call it up later. Should also include whatever filters (conditions) were present at the time and any values there. Ideally also check if any Sorting was applied and save that. Our use case is users have a list of patients, the table has a possible 50 columns with all kinds of data. Users sometimes want to see just two columns, other times a different set of 5 columns, sometimes they’ve applied a filter as well. And with 100 different users, there isn’t necessarily enough overlap to say, build a tab with a dedicated table for a particular use case. We’re looking at utilizing a custom object (maybe Saved View) to store personalization settings, then let us
I have made few fields required on skuid page and when User fill the form and left any of the field blank. e.g First Name, Last Name, State, Address Mobile Number etc. An error message will be shown on top of the field like This field is required. In addition to this, an another message like Required fields has no value will also be shown at the bottom. I just want to hide this error message at bottom. Please suggest.?
Not sure if this can be done and i don’t know it but i would like to allow users to hide or show fields in a field editor like we do columns of a table. Is this possible or on the list of things to do?
It would be very helpful if when you create a filter with Pick Options and Condition(s) created automatically, that there was the ability to add ‘Blank’ to the auto created filter options.One example of a use case would be if an opportunity is in the ‘Finals’ stage, show all opportunities where ‘Date sent’ is blank. This would also be helpful to see all opps where multiple specified fields are blank.There is no good work around for this. (Unless someone can suggest one I haven’t though of!) They all have restrictive limitations. If your picklists have a large number of values then manually creating conditions for each filter becomes time restrictive. Creating toggle buttons based on an ‘is blank’ condition will get cluttered when used in addition to the normal filters, not to mention the normal filters and the toggle condition buttons can contradict each other. Sorting on a column header does not re-query a model so if there are too many records to display on page load then the result
I have a use case that needs this functionality.Is there a way to disable this via js?
Thought this might be helpful for folks. This is a snippet that you can use on tables to limit the values of a picklist field to the permitted ones for a selected Record type. Skuid tables don’t have record context, so the default behavior is to display all picklist values for a field in the filter. For more involved objects, this gets unwieldy. The code here is an extension of this article: https://docs.skuid.com/latest/en/skuid/filters/snippet-as-item-source.html and the setup of the page (and the logic) is pretty similar to how it’s described in the article. A model condition driving the table needs to work off the RecordTypeId and only works with a condition where the operator is “=” (No multiple values allowed in the condition). We use “Field from another model” for the condition and that one looks up the RecordType object which is either accepting a parameter fed into it or setting the DeveloperName to pull the recordType as well as an SObject condition. If the filter is
Is this expected behavior? I have skuid pages on both the Issues and Work_Entries__c tabs.
Seems like everyone is talking about Airtable these days. Just one example, my wife is an teacher and has for years struggled to even understand what I do as a Salesforce / database consultant. This weekend she built her own CRM base on airtable in a matter of hours, and got extremely excited about building out her entire side business on Airtable. Kind of makes me start thinking of Salesforce as “old school”.As that business grows, I can imagine the need to connect airtable bases to a customer community to expose certain data to the customer.Seems like a good idea for Skuid to build out a data source connector.
I’ve seen some use a snippet to set the colour index after setting the colours in the chart. I’d like to set the colours dynamically based on colour values stored on the record. Anybody done this so far?Embarking on it right now. I’ll post here if I find a solution.Starting here. https://api.highcharts.com/highcharts/series.column.colors
I have a use case that requires the use of the following condition. This operator isn’t an option unless you edit in XML or use another field that does allow it and switch the field afterwards.
The Skuid community keeps growing…yay!Seems like recent releases have been a bit…less than polished…I know I would and I’m sure many other consultants/developers would likely be happy to be part of public beta tests before General Availability rollout.Love working with the product, and more than happy to help ensure it’s wonderful in future releases.
I was planning on creating rows in a UI-Only model from chart series data with context set as per the chart id. This is a dashboard page that used mostly the same data displayed in many different ways. So I’ve leveraged a few tricks to use a model for multiple charts and tables.I know this is an oddball way of doing this, but believe me when I say it’s certainly the best for my use case. I’d otherwise have over a hundred models on the page.Anywho, seems like the component would be something useful to have in more than just my situation.
As per subject. I’d like to add these conditions via the XML.
This came to me this morning. It would be useful to know when the page is getting close to the limit.
Lately I’ve been needing to run actions after a component is rendered in order to run an action/snippet. A recent use case was to calculate the % of opps each agg by stage row represented in the drawer. I worked around it using the value of the row in context since it had the total number of opps I needed to calc each stage’s %. My current use is to add level 2 drawer tables to an array of visible tables in order to create my own custom sticky headers which will duplicate the current rows headers and additional level information. The pic below would additionally display “David LastName - Capital Placed / Additional Possible” just above or below the floating header when the current row doesn’t show it’s header. My work around for this is set a timeout on the row action that adds the drawer elements in order to able to target them after render. Works fine except for an additional time delay for the UX.
I like the ability to quickly create a table or field editor with all fields in the model, however I find it a bit frustrating to use. I tend to accidentally double-click when I mean to single click to expand the fields/conditions/actions…or I click once, those options expand and the model’s location on the page changes, so then my second click is on something other than the model.I think it would be easier UX to have this feature as a button next to the model clone and delete buttons, instead of as a double-click interaction.
Currently can’t use the field value of a row in context to conditionally components/component elements within drawer and/or popup.My use case:Conditionally Render “Show Details” and “Hide Details” global actions based on UI field value in row in context.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.