Product Forums

I’m not sure if this is intentional or a potential bug so starting this off as a question… On a custom view in a table, the standard sequence of events is: beforeRender, render, renderComplete However, when a new row is added to a model, the order is render, beforeRender, renderComplete Questions: Is this order by design or a potential bug? From a logical perspective and to be consistent with other call sequences, it would seem that the sequence should be beforeRender, render, renderComplete especially when the name “beforRender” implies it comes before rendering. Should beforeRender/renderComplete even be getting called in this case? There is something to be said for the fact that beforeRender & renderComplete shouldn’t even be called in this case as the only thing that is “rendered” is the item not the list. Steps to reproduce: Create page using XML below Preview page open debug console Expected Behavior = Actual Behavior the first rendering of the custom view follows the bef

When a custom view is visible (e.g. Table custom view), if the component (e.g. table) is “rendered out”, the tearDown function is not being called. This leads to the inability to “cleanup” (e.g. unregister/remove/destroy) resources that the view has created/registered/etc. Unfortunately, it is not possible to override the list or editor of a table in this case because the view doesn’t “own” the editor/list and overriding these methods would impact those resources. In short, there is no way to reliably “cleanup” a custom view when conditionally rendered “out”. Steps to reproduce Create page using XML below Preview page Change to “Basic” view Change to “List” View Expected Behavior = Actual Behavior tearDown is called (see console message) Change to “Basic” view Toggle the “HideTable” field above the table to Expected Behavior tearDown is called when table is rendered “out” Actual Behavior tearDown is NOT called when table is rendered “out” Sample Page <skuidpage unsavedchangeswarni

Is there a good way to find the length of a string witha ui-only field? Or do I have to use javascript?

Every time I view an attachment file with the extension of “.txt” in skuid mobile, special characters gets appended to the preview of the file. This only happens on “.txt” files I already tried using a template and using this “{{Name}}” still gets redirected with the special characters.

I’m looking to update a text field on one model (New Conga Template) with the values from same field on all selected rows of another model (Conga Templates) separate by commas. Our use case is we have a skuid page for submitting a new Conga Template request. We want users to be able to choose from existing Conga Templates to list in the new template’s Template Group field. Template Group is a text field that reads multiple values separated by commas, e.g. Internal Template, External Templates, Community Templates, etc. I’ve built a popup that has a table with an aggregate model of existing Conga Templates grouped by Template Group. I’d like to build a Mass Action that updates the Template Group field on my New Template model with a comma-separate list of the Template Group values from each selected row in the table. I know with child records you could do something like {{#Child__r.records}}{{SomeField__c}}, {{/Child__r.records}} to list all the values for all child records. So really t

I am working on a Skuid page to pull back a list of objects from a REST endpoint. I am using a REST model and binding it to a table. How does an External Data Source REST model work with paging for a table?My return object returns a paginated collection looking like: {<br>Collection: [{name: "joe", id=1}, {name: "Shmo", id=1}],<br>TotalRecords: 1000,<br>NextPage: "myfakeservice.com/v1/objects?NextPage=2"<br>} How would a load more button work on a skuid table when connected to an External Data Source? I’m afraid of doing a lot of javascript hacking to implement paging functionality.

I have a dashboard that I built in SKUID, which was working wonderfully. I recently received an “Apex heap size too large” error, and updated to the latest Rockaway release which seemed to fix the heap size issue. It has just recently come back and I’m not sure what is causing this. The page has many models and rows, but not nearly as many as I’ve done in the past. I’m not sure why this is happening, any advice would be appreciated, thanks!

Hi,Coming back to skuid charts again. We have a requirement to display opportunity count for account based on month and split by year. problem is when a user clicks on any bar, i am able to pass on the month value ({{$Chart.point.name}}). however, the year value which is split type is not passed on to popup. thereby causing a problem. i looked at highchart documentation as well but couldn’t find any solution for it. is there any property that i have missed which can provide value of split field?

I need to reference selected rows in a table that is no longer in context. I can get it to work with all returned records, but not with specific rows. My table is name UpdateForm1. I’m trying to set the Id from each row as the WhatId in the snippet below: var params =arguments[0]; var $ = skuid.$; var models = skuid.model.map(); // Define “What” model (Record Ids from this model will be used as the WhatId) var updateForm = models.VendorChecklist; // Define the task model where new row will be created var newActivity = models.NewActivity; // Define the task model used to create the temporary Task (End user sets field values from this model) var taskModel = models.TaskHistory; //Define the task record Fields that will be used on the new task records var thisActivityAssignedTo = taskModel.getFirstRow().OwnerId; var thisActivitySubject = taskModel.getFirstRow().Subject; var thisActivityWho = taskModel.getFirstRow().WhoId; var thisActivityIntCat = taskModel.getFirstRow().Interaction_Categor

When attempting to create a page pack for a module that contains no pages, the operation starts and then “hangs” with the modal message of “Packaging Pages into StaticResources”Notes1) This occurs in Banzai & Rockaway2) I would think this is low priority given a user wouldn’t normally attempt this but some boundary/error checking should likely be added.Steps to reproduce:1) Create a new Skuid module2) Attempt to create a page pack for the module added in #1Expected BehaviorEither a message indicating that there are no pages to pack or successful completion of the static resource (just with no pages)Actual BehaviorUI hangs with message “Packing Pages into StaticResources”

Hello All, when loading the first page on my mobile app (Menu page)I get a grey loading screen before it loads to the main menu. I have no models running - all are activated and ran by conditions. This behavior was not happening a while back (no loading screen would come up)Below is a screenshot of what is happening. http://screencast.com/t/QUcrh8ykiiJnThanks everyone!

We have a page that used to cover two record types of opportunities, we just cloned it to cover just a single record type, “Commercial”, and now any edits to the cloned page do not update anything on the runtime. It’s in Sandbox on Summer 16. Any way to hard clear a cache maybe?

This is a continuation of a previous issue I had here: https://community.skuid.com/t/cannot-use-userinfo-fields-for-includes-in-model-condition I’m making changes to this page and am running into the same issue of my query being malformed. Here is the query that is being generated: SELECT Comments__c,Level_1__c,Level_2__c,Level_3__c,Recommendation__c,TBA_Selection__c,TBA_Selection__r.Name,Tags__c,Value__c,Score_Type__c,Probe_questions_for_in_person_interviews__c,Id FROM TBA_Score__c WHERE (Level_1__c = 'Activity')AND(Level_2__c = 'Written Assignment')AND(Level_3__c = 'Question 1')AND(Score_Type__c = 'Written Assessment')AND(TBA_Selection__c = 'a2A80000000SOS0EAO')AND(Question__c = '1')AND(Tags__c = 'Written#, Q1#')AND((TBA_Selection__r.X2nd_Reviewer__c includes 'Yinnie Tse')OR(TBA_Selection__r.Written_Focus_Reviewer_Q1__c includes 'Yinnie Tse'))AND(Reviewer__c = '005800000046Q0DAAU') And this is what it should look like (and what works when I test from the Dev

Table / Queue Filters & Search Properties: When you select the checkbox “Use SOSL to improve search performance”, then change the search method to client, in the background SOSL is still selected and you are not able to add fields to search on. You have to change the search method again to Server, deselect SOSL, change search method back to client and now you are able to add fields.

On your skuid sit you have the following meta data: user" href="/sCSS/36.0/sprites/1461274792000/Theme3/default/base/zen-componentsCompatible.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />user" href="/sCSS/36.0/sprites/1461274792000/Theme3/default/base/elements.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />user" href="/sCSS/36.0/sprites/1461274792000/Theme3/default/base/common.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />user" href="/sCSS/36.0/sprites/1459383356000/Theme3/base/dStandard.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />user" href="/sCSS/36.0/sprites/1460469361000/Theme3/00D40000000Mw0S/00540000001dZLT/base/dCustom0.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />user" href="/sCSS/36.0/sprites/1460469361000/Theme3/00D40000000Mw0S/00540000001dZLT/base/dCustom1.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />user" href="/sCSS/36.0/sprites/1461274792000/Theme3/default/base/extended.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />user" href="/sCSS/36.0/sprites/1461274792000/Theme3/default/base/setup.c

dynamically show image stored as static resource based on field value.  I thought I saw this snippet somewhere but can't find it.  If anyone knows please provide the link.if field value = x then show image.1if field value = y then show image.2etc

I have three record types on the Account object - Client, Operator, Supplier. The Account ‘Type’ field has values which are dependent on these record types.But I can’t get these dependencies to work in a table for each model. Each model belongs to a table in a tab, and the filter for the Account ‘Type’ shows all the values (rather than the dependent values).I’ve checked and re-checked the following based on some other posts:- Model condition set to the DeveloperName of the RecordType- Model condition set to the 18 digit recordTypeID and checked that field is in the model- Cleared browser cookies- Tried a different browser- changed and re-saved the page to clear cache and tried again.I can’t seem to figure this one out - have I missed something?

I’m trying to render a component based on the # of rows in a model compared to a variable. I’ve created a generic scenario using a formula field (below), but have had the same problem with “real” number fields. Example (should work in any instance): <skuidpage unsavedchangeswarning="yes" personalizationmode="server" showsidebar="false" showheader="false"> <models> <model id="Account" limit="20" query="true" createrowifnonefound="false" adapter="" type="" sobject="Account"> <fields> <field id="Count" uionly="true" displaytype="FORMULA" label="Count" readonly="true" returntype="DOUBLE" precision="2" scale="0"> <formula>1</formula> </field> </fields> <conditions> <condition type="param" value="account" field="Id" operator="=" enclosevalueinquotes="true" novaluebehavior="noquery"/> </conditions> <actions/>

[Mobile] Look-up field doesn’t have a search icon also, when a user clicks the right most area of the filed, a distorted loop up option will show with unclickable names. Is this a bug?

I have a table that is in a second pop up, that when creating a mass action, the table row context is not correct. Instead of putting the row Id of the selected rows in the created row, it puts the Id of the previous selected pop up in the row.An individual row action works, and the mass update and delete functionality works. Its just the mass multiple actions action that does not work.Any thoughts on how to resolve this?

When creating a row in a table that in a pop up, I receive the invalid cross reference id error. I have two models (different objects) that are set up identically, one works, the other doesn’t. The model that is receiving the error is VendorContactsPU

ContentVersion model still queries even though it’s source model “ContentDocumentLink” model is empty and ContentVersion model’s condition is set to “abort Query if source model has no row”

the Non-Skuid Users in our environment are getting “Insufficient Privileges” when they try to open standard salesforce.com detail page for record.ThanksSandeep