Skuid NLX, SFX, & EXP

This would be awesome:

Can we have the preview button on the mobile page builder open in a new tab the same way preview works on the desktop builder?

Would like the search filters to be able to show up on top of each column according to the search field (match up with its filtering column)

It might be nice to have an action available in the action framework to allow us to “set the context” for merge syntax to a particular model and row (first, last, or number).That way we could avoid creating a model just to store values that we need to use multiple times to ‘create a new row.’ (A very nice trick, btw. Hat tipped to Pat.)And we can avoid merge syntax strings that always look like {{$Model.MyModel.data.0.Field__c}} instead of just {{Field__c}}.

Unless I’m missing something, this doesn’t exist yet. We can only use the values of a picklist or reference field for a multiselect filter. It would be nice to be able to specify those manually.

The Page Include type of “Page Assignment” is really cool! But…I would love to have the ability to use the “Other Situation” page assignments here!A specific use case would be lists of items & and applicable actions that only users in specific roles should be able to take.We have a page for each of these roles’ lists, and can just render page includes conditionally… but it feels like adding page assignments for each would make things very clean & easy to plug into any page!

I often find I would like to be able to edit my pages without disrupting people using the pages in production.  For simple pages, I can just duplicate the page.  But for complex pages, like those that use Page Includes, that approach doesn’t work.  And for us (and I’ll bet many of you), we don’t have a full data sandbox, so we can’t really test the pages in the sandbox very well.I would love to instead be able to determine which page version is assigned to users.  I’m thinking we could use labels (or tags) that we could assign to versions of pages, where a single label can only be assigned to one version within a single page.  For example, and label might be “Beta” or “Production” or “Development”.   But no page can have multiple versions with the same label (but a single version can have multiple labels).Then I’d like a page where I can specify by user and role to assign which label they should be getting (and bonus points if I can select module as well, even better for release manage

Today you can assign a default theme, and assign themes based on users or profiles.  I’d like to be able to do a theme assignment by module name.  This way I can assign a theme to specific modules across all pages - such as all my Support Community pages, vs. all of my Partner Community pages.  I don’t want to just segment by who is using it, but also by what the content is.One possible implementation would be to extend the Skuid Settings / Theme Preferences /  Profile/User Overrides page.  If you had a “Modules” column, I could have flexibility on assignment based on user, profile and module, including:All pages using module XYZ (leaving User/Profile blank) All profiles of name ABC for all modules (leaving module blank) All page using module XYZ for user DEF There would need to be some priority logic, likely by reordering the list, so that when there were conflicts it would be clear which rule would eventually win (the last rule wins?).For us, that would let us say “All internal Suppo

Here’s my use case.I’d like to create new tasks for all users added to a “Users” model based on based on the values in a “TaskTemplate” model. I can then easily use merge syntax to create these new tasks for each user selected.

The ability to notify the user when they are going to navigate away from a Skuid page with unsaved changes is awesome. I have a use case where I want to put a “Cancel” button at the top of the page as they go through a wizard. The button is using the action framework to show a message and block the UI, cancel changes, and then redirect to they keyprefix for the object. However, when the redirect happens, it still gives the user a warning about navigating away.It would be GREAT AND SUPER AWESOME if we could have a way to disable this feature when doing this type of action in the framework.

This is a continuation of this thread, but a separate problem.Here’s my code (thanks for your help, Pat!) var model = arguments[0].model,    row = arguments[0].row, <br>    $ = skuid.$,<br>    dfd = new $.Deferred();<br>var mA = skuid.$M('AllAppointments');<br>mA.createRow({additionalConditions:[<br>        {field: 'Start__c', value: row.Start__c},<br>        {field: 'End__c', value: row.End__c},<br>        {field: 'Room__c', value: row.Room__c}<br>    ]});<br>    <br>model.deleteRow(row);<br>$.when(mA.save())<br>   .done(function(){<br>       var rA = mA.getFirstRow();<br>       mA.setCondition(mA.getC

Here is the standard way to make use of the Convert Lead and Find Duplicates functionality./lead/leadconvert.jsp?retURL=%2F{{Id}}&id={{Id}}/lead/leadmergewizard.jsp?retURL=%2F{{Id}}&id={{Id}}In my opinion, there is not that much to gain from attempting to create a custom Skuid page for this functionality. One thing that can be done is to remove the header and sidebar. Add the  URL parameter “&isdtp=vw”. This is especially useful if you’ve created a “skinned” experience of salesforce.

We’ve only been using Skuid for 6 months and have quite a few pages created and some are development/testing vs live pages across multiple parts of the business and objects in SFDC.  It would be great to have a way to organize all of the pages on the Pages tab with folders or even tags and then be able to drill down or filter based on those.You can search, but I don’t know what the new test page is called that someone has started working on was named.

Love it! Thanks.http://help.skuidify.com/m/11720/l/129517

Hi Guys,Is there a way to conditionally enable or to dynamically insert/remove a mass action into table? In our example we have a mass action “Send to DrawLoop” on a client list which does as described. It’s wonderful. The problem is that not all of our clients use DrawLoop, some use Conga, and some don’t do document generation.For Conga clients we obviously want a different “Send to Conga” action, and for clients that don’t do document generation we don’t want anything.

I’m sure lots of us would love the ability to have editable fields from a parent or lookup object represented directly in a table. We didn’t seem to have this here as an official proposal/idea, so I’m adding it for the purposes of tracking interest and possible progress. There are a few related solutions, like popping up an editor, drawers, or showing related objects’ fields as read-only, but not the prefect solution that my users want.

I would like to see filters get some of the treatments that other Skuid objects have, including:- The ability to set a class and ID on a filter control- The ability to control rendering of a filter controlI’d also love to see another filter-like concept where you can sort based on some order by clauses either on a toggle button or a select option, similar to select filters with manual settings.I’ve been able to implement this functionality (conditional rendering of filters and filters doing sorts) on a queue, but it takes some snippet and CSS trickery to make it happen - so it would be awesome if it were in the core product.But if anybody needs help making it happen, let me know!  Glad to share the code / concepts.- Chris

Thank you!!!As per this idea, love this in the current release. Not sure when it was introduced, but a small thing that adds great polish to the user experience.https://community.skuid.com/t/convert-action-type-to-run-multiple-actions

It’s a bit of a pain to have to create previous and next nav buttons for each time I add a step in a wizard component. Seems like automatically adding these would be a pretty simple thing to do, and is likely desirable for anyone using a wizard.

Skuid’s feature to automatically include JS & CSS (see ) is extremely beneficial. That said, it comes with some challenges when using features such as Page Includes as, unfortunately, not all javascript, jQuery, etc. is written to properly handle multiple “loads.” Also, browsers like Chrome, etc. have some hidden “tricks” when loading a file multiple times and gaining access to the source in the debug console is not terribly obvious (e.g. Chrome creates VM#### files for secondary copies of js, etc.). On top of all that, there is a slight performance hit that is unnecessary to incur. In our particular case, we use multiple third-party libraries that track state and when getting reloaded, lose their state or end up having multiple objects all tracking the same things (e.g mutation events). Note that we’re concat’ing all of these libraries in to a single JS file. One solution would be to modify all these libraries to “ifdef” around the loading - not ideal because as new versions c

This is really just for the filter component. Video also talks about mobile like divs and grids, but panel sets do the trick.

Just a thought, and I’m not sure if this has been requested before:Users sometimes find the concept of the ‘Load More’ data button confusing when paired with having to select ‘Next’ at the base of a table to access the newly loaded data.It’d be nice to have the option of the ‘Next’ button change to ‘Load More’ once the limit’s been reached. Selecting it would then load the new data and move to the next set of table rows.

Lately I’ve been needing to run some logic after the user has completed changing some things, but before the model is saved.  I’ve tried the row.updated event, but it triggers as soon as an item changes rather than when user user says to commit.  And models.saved is after the object has been committed.  Is there an event I can get when the model is about to be committed - like after the user clicks SAVE and before the actual save is sent to SFDC?As an example use case, I want to detect when the user enables a checkbox and then set some audit logging in another field (such as the ID of the user who changed it).  I don’t want to overwrite the old value if the user should just check and uncheck the box (which is what would happen on row.updated events).  And I’d prefer not having to commit the data twice, which is what happens when I use models.saved (and, I no longer have access to the original values, which means I have to manually save values when the object is loaded).Any other way to

Any chance a CSS property could be added to Page Includes?  It has a unique ID but is lacking CSS currently.Thank you!

Peter Bender put me onto these ideas. Seems fairly easy to do. I made some something that meets the need but then it’s not slick and part of the package. Wherever page versions are presented please add these row actions.