Skuid NLX, SFX, & EXP

Is this expected behavior? I have skuid pages on both the Issues and Work_Entries__c tabs.

Seems like everyone is talking about Airtable these days. Just one example, my wife is an teacher and has for years struggled to even understand what I do as a Salesforce / database consultant. This weekend she built her own CRM base on airtable in a matter of hours, and got extremely excited about building out her entire side business on Airtable. Kind of makes me start thinking of Salesforce as “old school”.As that business grows, I can imagine the need to connect airtable bases to a customer community to expose certain data to the customer.Seems like a good idea for Skuid to build out a data source connector.

I’ve seen some use a snippet to set the colour index after setting the colours in the chart. I’d like to set the colours dynamically based on colour values stored on the record. Anybody done this so far?Embarking on it right now. I’ll post here if I find a solution.Starting here. https://api.highcharts.com/highcharts/series.column.colors

I have a use case that requires the use of the following condition. This operator isn’t an option unless you edit in XML or use another field that does allow it and switch the field afterwards.

The Skuid community keeps growing…yay!Seems like recent releases have been a bit…less than polished…I know I would and I’m sure many other consultants/developers would likely be happy to be part of public beta tests before General Availability rollout.Love working with the product, and more than happy to help ensure it’s wonderful in future releases.

I was planning on creating rows in a UI-Only model from chart series data with context set as per the chart id. This is a dashboard page that used mostly the same data displayed in many different ways. So I’ve leveraged a few tricks to use a model for multiple charts and tables.I know this is an oddball way of doing this, but believe me when I say it’s certainly the best for my use case. I’d otherwise have over a hundred models on the page.Anywho, seems like the component would be something useful to have in more than just my situation.

As per subject. I’d like to add these conditions via the XML.

This came to me this morning. It would be useful to know when the page is getting close to the limit.

Lately I’ve been needing to run actions after a component is rendered in order to run an action/snippet. A recent use case was to calculate the % of opps each agg by stage row represented in the drawer. I worked around it using the value of the row in context since it had the total number of opps I needed to calc each stage’s %. My current use is to add level 2 drawer tables to an array of visible tables in order to create my own custom sticky headers which will duplicate the current rows headers and additional level information. The pic below would additionally display “David LastName - Capital Placed / Additional Possible” just above or below the floating header when the current row doesn’t show it’s header. My work around for this is set a timeout on the row action that adds the drawer elements in order to able to target them after render. Works fine except for an additional time delay for the UX.

I like the ability to quickly create a table or field editor with all fields in the model, however I find it a bit frustrating to use. I tend to accidentally double-click when I mean to single click to expand the fields/conditions/actions…or I click once, those options expand and the model’s location on the page changes, so then my second click is on something other than the model.I think it would be easier UX to have this feature as a button next to the model clone and delete buttons, instead of as a double-click interaction.

Currently can’t use the field value of a row in context to conditionally components/component elements within drawer and/or popup.My use case:Conditionally Render “Show Details” and “Hide Details” global actions based on UI field value in row in context.

Hello all! Amazing what you can do by digging around in the Skuid API. I’ve needed to re-jig Skuid’s pagination for a Lightning Community and thought I’d post a first-draft of my efforts here in case anyone wants to build their own and wanted a place to start. Feedback welcomed. The main missing element is how to set the current page size of the table/deck (e.g. 5, 10, 50, Show All) - would some kind Skuid-person please point me in the right direction? I’d be terribly grateful 🙂 I’m sure there are some horribly bits in my code. Sorry… To get it to work (in Lightning): Add a template component (allowing HTML) with the following content: <div class="pager"> <div class="pager-controls"> <a class="pager-first" href="#">First</a> <a class="pager-prev" href="#">Previous</a> <ul class="pager-items"> </ul> <a class="pager-next" href="#">Next</a> <a class="pager-last" href="#">

Seems obvious. I have never wanted to have these states out of sync.

Just used it for the first time… LOVE IT!

We want to inform the community of a significant issue that affects clients using Skuid on Salesforce in Lightning App Builder pages. HistoryAs soon as Summer '18 pre-release orgs were available, Skuid began testing. As soon as we became aware of this issue in the pre-release org, Skuid reported to Salesforce that Skuid pages displaying within Lightning App Builder pages do not load and result in this error message in the console: Error: Invalid XML: [Your Page’s XML]The case was escalated to Salesforce’s R&D and they have been working on a fix for this issue. Skuid’s product engineers have also looked into this issue and are, unfortunately, unable to provide a workaround for this issue. All preview instance sandboxes (check here to see if you are on a preview or non preview sandbox instance) were upgraded to Summer '18 on May 4th and 5th. What Does this mean to Me? I use Skuid on Lightning using VisualForce overrides:You should NOT experience any issues. If you are, please let us

As of 11.0.8, if you have a single Mass Action on a table, even if that mass action is hidden due to rendering conditions, you will see the checkboxes next to table rows. Would be great if those checkboxes disappeared when all mass actions are hidden. in screenshot below, flag selected rows for deletion is the only mass action, and it is hidden from non-admin users, but the checkboxes are still there. admin users get the mass action:

I use the mustache syntax {{$Model.myModel.data.0.Id}} a lot in conjunction with the “Update a Field on Row(s)” action. It would be great if this action had the same options available when setting model conditions, such as “Field from another model”, “Single Specified Value”, “None - blank value”, “Result of subquery”, etc.

Yo!Maybe this is possible? Maybe this is dumb? But I just wanted to jot it down here:1. Wouldn’t it be cool if you could trigger a Salesforce Action from a record which was a Lightning Component which was a Skuid page which could reference the ID of the record being viewed!?2. Salesforce’s Flow tool can include screens containing Lighting Components - wouldn’t it be cool if those Lightning Components could be a Skuid page which had access to the recordId variable in the Flow?!This would allow us to store some user actions in the Highlights Panel component in the Salesforce detail record view = all kinds of sweet.Cheers!Louis

In Millau release Skuid has a declarative option to Upload attachments to ContentDocument  which is extremely helpful in migrating to “Files” for all attachment needs.But i still could not find any declarative option to Create Enhanced notes (ContentNote). Enhanced Notes provide users the rich text options which is currently missing from our Skuid Pages. We can query ContentNote and ContentDocumentLink objects to view all the notes that have been created but there is no option to create and edit them within Skuid.http://releasenotes.docs.salesforce.com/en-us/winter16/release-notes/rn_sales_notes.htm This is a hightly sought out feature by our end users.  So what we would like to know is if there are any plans to incorporate it in Skuid Declaratively? If yes then i would really appreciate if you can provide us some timeline on when can we expect it to be available. As based on it we can plan our development to use Skuid vs SF Lightning pages.

As per title. Would be super slick. 😉

Possible?

Skuid Team, Thanks for adding the ability (in 11.1.8) to run other actions when a Branch action returns true. This will save a lot of copying of action steps just to run the same actions whether a Branch is true or false. Best, Bill

New post to get additional comments since this other postis closed for comments. 😉 Here’s a simple example of this mornings use of this requested feature.

There are times it would be useful to interact with models across parent and page includes. Issue being is that working with each in the page builder doesn’t expose the models from the other.Though it would be more prone to braking, it would be nice to be able to set which model(s) an action is to be performed on by typing out the Name/Id.