Product Forums

I’ve just tested one my skuid pages on Salesforce1 and immediately noticed something. There are many elements on the page that I’d like to not render since my mobile phone screen is too small.Can we have the conditionally render/format based on screen size, OS and/or browser?I’d like to set styling and conditionally render based on these. ie. text size, element sizes, table columns.

QueryString parameters on page includes is a common topic within the community.  Currently, the only approach to obtaining querystring params on a page include is to configure a model to receive those parameters.  While functional, it’s less than ideal and has its shortcomings/bugs (see here).Would like to see an enhancement to Skuid that provides a clean approach to, at least programmatically, obtaining the QS params for a page include.  A couple of ideas to get things started:1) In the pageload event on a page include, include an argument that contains the params for that page2) In skuid.page.params, add a method (e.g. getParams(pageName)) that would get the parameters for the given pagename.  I see that there is now an “_parametersByPage” property of skuid.page which would aid in supporting this ty

The ButtonSet component requires a model despite the fact that it exists in the “Layout” section of the component toolbox. No other components in the “Layout” section even have a model property let along require one. If you do not specify a model for the ButtonSet, you encounter the error: “Invalid Model ‘undefined’ on Button Set component. This Model’s Id may have been changed, or the Model may have been deleted.” There is no reason for ButtonSet to require a model. If a ButtonSet does not have a model, it should still function. Requiring a model creates unnecessary overhead - the model should be optional. Steps to reproduce: Create page using XML below preview page Expected Behavior Page displays successfully Actual Behavior Encounter “Invalid Model ‘undefined’ on Button Set component. This Model’s Id may have been changed, or the Model may have been deleted.” error. Sample Page XML

I have to give Pat Vachon (mBlazonry) a lot of credit for coming up with this awesome and stupidly easy-to-implement idea! By adding a UI-only formula field to a parent model and using the syntax below in the UI formula builder…you can calculate and display rollup summaries. {{CustomObject__r.totalSize}} Notes: Just be sure to add the child relationship to your model within the model’s fields section. No Master-Detail relationship needed (lookups relationships are fine) No third-party app needed like DLRS (declarative rollup summaries) or Rollup Helper Usable directly in a basic model on field editors, tables, templates, page titles…no need to build a separate aggregate model Granted…this is a UI-only field, so the summary isn’t saved to the object, but you could easily solve that with an action sequence that would 1) update a SF field with the UI-only value and 2) save down

Can I set a condition model based on UIOnly field?I have a lot of problems working with task and opportuntiy. I need to filter tasks by opportunity stage

Will there be any integration available with Salesforce Einstein?

Many others have asked for this for their particular use case, but this really should be a default option for each field. ie. phone number, zip/postal code, email, etc.

As Skuid becomes the main tool of development, I find myself going into the XML more and more, either to copy and paste between pages, or sometimes to replicate things several times on the same page, for example copy a table into multiple places, or add the same filter to several models. There are benefits to editing in the XML as well, such as if you change a table’s model in the XML, it doesn’t clear out the Template fields the way it does in the page builder. Another example is for very complex bits of action framework, or export options, sometimes it’s easier to see in the XML. SO, what I would like to propose is a new tab on the component properties window called XML, that shows you all the xml for that component in a resizable text area, and lets you edit it in a popup with the little < > button, like editing a template field.

As per title.Kinda important. 😉

Hi, I want to use my own custom icon set for skuid theme (which is created by me based on modern theme). I want to get a feature similar to provided by skuid to add icons to buttons, tabs etc. Can we do that ? I don’t want to do this in the way of upload icons image and adding classes to buttons…doesn’t like hacks… just looking for a feature similar to skuid standard feature to choose icons…Team let me know is it possible now ?

AI capability like Alexa on Marketo.

I’d like the ability to configure filters (multiselect, toggle, etc.) client-side. Specifically to be used to filter a REST model.

Hi,I am new to SKUID. Want to know if we can eliminate the manual steps to unpack the skuid page in target org while migratiing the skuid changes from one org to another?Currently what we do is:1) We pack our pages in source org.2) We deploy the static resources using ANT migration toolkit.3) We unpack the static resource in target org.Can we automate this #3 manual step?Thanks,Atul

There’s one thing that’s been nagging at me. Upgrading the Skuid version is problematic in the sense of which bugs are in each version. Clearly, upon release nothing has yet been identified. But, for those waiting for a more stable version, we are waiting for a few iterations to get a more stable version.That said, it is not known which bugs we are “trading” in for. It would nice to see the known issues (regressions) of each release. It might the difference of choosing one release vs.  another.

I would like to be able to create a condition of a google docs model where we can display records based on some sort of wild card eg beth for all documents that include ‘beth’ … has anyone had any success with this. I realise I can create a condition on title but it seems to be exact match only?

Like in my use case I’d relabel it to “Outstanding” as my chart categories by the Date_Completed__c field.

This functionality would be awesome in Skuid. Dynamics Sales Path and Required fields per Stage in the Path. Not as slick as Dynamics Business Process Flow, but still much better than just a Status field.I know it can accomplished quite similarly with Progress Bar custom component and Conditionally Rendered Field Editors, but seems like the metadata would have to be pulled into the Skuid Page with custom JS anyway. New component would be better due to this.https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.api_meta.meta/api_meta/meta_pathassistant.htm Otherwise have to create a simulated Sales Path using conditional rendering of a field editor for each stage. Works but prefer having a component to display this with the fields since there’s the added benefit of having “Guidance for Sucess”

I need to do rollup values from the standard Task object to my custom Project object. Apparently the Declarative Lookup Rollup Summary doesn’t work with recurring tasks. So now I’d like to use the Child Relationship multiple times with differing conditions in order to get Task Counts for each scenario. ie. Overdue Tasks, Total Hours Completed (rollup on custom field), etc. I’d have to make use of a snippet to do anything other than a count, but no big deal. I’m figuring that this something that isn’t possible with Salesforce SOQL. 😕 I don’t otherwise have a solution, unless I go to custom apex, which I’d clearly like to avoid. Anybody have an idea?

I’m finding it difficult in troubleshooting custom theme issues. It’s usually based on the issues stemming from the base theme.So, can you please add a Lookup field to the Theme record for which it was based on?I can then go directly test that theme to see if it’s the base theme or the customizations made on the custom theme.

Easier for me to articulate out-loud, so video explanation of my idea below:

There are countless locations where this applies. The more that is done here, the better the UX becomes. While stating from any assumptions in determining what to auto-set, the addition and settings can become much more automated.Search BoxesSearch box when selecting fields for component. Search box when selecting models in action framework “Save Models”, “Query Models”, “Cancel Models”,  Input FieldsMessage input when “Show message and block UI”. URL input when “Redirect to URL”. Drop DownsAuto drop down drop “Model” down list in “Activate & Set value of Model Condition”, “Activate Model Condition”, “Deactivate Model Condition”, “Query Model”, “Deactivate Filterable Conditions”, “Save Models”, “Query Models”, “Cancel Models”, “Update a field on row(s)”, …Stopping here as you get the idea. 😉

As per title.

As per title.

I have page includes that I use everywhere that I’d like to conditionally render certain things based on the query string. ie. table columns, row actions, mass action, global actions.In my use case, I have accounting journal entries that are related to one of many types of accounting records. Each of which I typically display these entries in varying ways.I can also do the model hack, but it really isn’t intuitive. Unless I could create one UI only model with a series of UI only checkbox field for each element on the page I’d like to conditionally render.Better yet, it would be great to be able to set to page input parameters on the page. Then when setting up the Page Include component, a tab dedicated to page input parameter parameters could be set. Much cleaner UX. 😃I would also use with Task and Event page includes.