Product Forums

When you use manual filter options, it shows a drop down unless the list is longer than 25 (by default). However, if you use automatically populated options, it always displays a text box with auto-complete, regardless of how few options there are. Is there a way to display a drop down without resorting to manually creating the filter options?

I have a product table on a wizard page. I have a row action on each row of the product table that creates a new record in the OpportunityProduct table, and attaches the product listed to the opportunity created in an earlier page of my wizard.For the first product, it works great, but if I try to add a second product (using the action button) the first product gets added again. I have tried to clear the model, but the removes the whole product table. Any ideas?

Hi, In a table I have set up a mass action to kind of ‘clone’ a row. Often I would need this action to create multiple new rows using data from the row i selected mass action on (let’s call it original row). the first row created works flawlessly, but all the rows after that, do not get info from original row, they try to fetch it from new row created above. Here’s my sequence action and the problem is that the first row gets info from original row perfectly. Create new row Add default value {{one_months_ago__c}} Create new row Add default value {{two_months_ago__c}} Save changes in model I tried specifying the row for merge value {{$Model.Bank_Statement.data.0.two_months_ago__c}} , but still not working. If i put a save action in between each ‘create new row’ It kind of works but takes the info from newly created row instead of original, and it’s very slow , specially if need to create 12 new rows, could take 5 min+… Any idea how i could force the default values to be always from the

I have a table with drawers. The drawer table has filter features.If I open 1 drawer and apply a filter I see the correct filtered rows in the drawer tableIf I have another drawer open at the same time, this drawer also shows the filtered rowsSo far, so good, however:If I then apply a different filter to the 2nd drawer, or even different values in the same filter, it shows the results of the new filter, but the first drawer then displays no rows. I then cannot change any filtering on the drawers and need to reload the page to get the filters to work at all.Any help much appreciated.Ben

We have a skuid page where we have a table component. We have freezed the column headers, allowed scroll bars and have set table height as 500px. We have also fixed the column widths. But when we are scrolling down in the table, the column headers are getting distorted i.e. column headers have different width and rest table data columns have different width.Please suggest solution for this issue.

I have a tab set with a count label referencing a model. How do I make this refresh when additional rows are added to each of the models. I can do it for a table, just not for these tab labels?

I have a template that has a field from an aggregate model in it (as well as some additional text).  How can I limit the number to 2 digits after the decimal?

Is there a chatter component I can pull onto my mobile detail pages, or a way to do this? Or is this a “wait for Brooklyn” thing? 

I’m trying to prepopulate a rich text field with formatting as html. The source for my html is an email template. What I’ve done so far is use a model to get the appropriate email template and the action framework to prepoulate the rich text field (which is an actual object field). However the rich text field flashes the rendered html as expected and then displays the raw html. Looking at the html source, I think that the html is being inserted as actual html so it displays as I expect, but then CK editor is escaping the html into text so it displays the raw html in the text editor. How can I take html and prepopulate a rich text field with it? Flashes this (which is what the html email looks like) And then displays this

I am trying to add a lookup filter to an owner field (the native one). The owner field on this object supports both groups and individual users. Here’s my configuration steps: Select field to filter - shows me this pop up: Selected “Group” and got all group fields. From this selected “Developer Name” Finished configuration of filter: When I preview the page, the filter works as expected on the group list and does not affect the user list: but at the top of the page I also get this error: “1. A Skuid Model, ‘_TempModel_1475080514836’, has a Condition on a Field with relationship name ‘DeveloperName’, on the User Object, but this Field appears to be invalid. Please check that this Field actually exists on this Object, (or on related Objects), and if it does not, change any Conditions on this Model that reference this Field.” What am I doing wrong here?

Followed the instructions on this tutorial - http://help.skuid.com/m/models-conditions-filters/l/102652-aggregate-models-make-dynamic-reports-in-… - but can’t get the Owner filter to display as a dropdown.  It only displays as a search box.

I am trying to figure out how to pass multiple values as conditions to a Page include. For instance, I am calling a Page via page include, call it “Prospects”. Prospects is a page that has a model of Accounts. Those Accounts have an Industry field and a Sub-Sector field. What I would like to accomplish is to filter the Prospects page via page include to show Accounts with either “Auto” or “Energy” as the Industry but NOT either “Clean Tech” or “Hybrid” as the Sub-Sectors.Could someone let me know if this is doable? And if so, how to accomplish this?

Hi,Facing issue in re-directing to detail page after record creation. I am using wizard control (Step1, Step2, Step3) to create a record from skuid. After click on ‘save’ button which is in step 3, expecting the new record to open in detail page of the record (it’s navigating to detail page but not showing record data except tabs which i used, here it’s failing to get the id of the new record after navigating to detail page) record id is generating and creating record in  list view. Added few field’s and button (buttons to navigate previous & next step) in each step but in step3 added one more button (Save and submit) to save the record, below are the actions behind save and submit button 1. Show message and block UI2. Update a field on rows3.  Save Model Changes (given my model name)4. Unblock the UI5. Close all popups5. Redirect to URL (URL : /apex/ui?page=My detail page name&Id={{{Id}}}&navOpen=Imperium)Expectation: Record should navigate to detail page immediate after r

I have added enable conditions to some fields in a field editor.  When the condition is met the field is enabled as expected but the item label color goes black.  Fields that don’t have enable conditions have  item labels colored blue from the theme that is set for the page.  Adding CSS to the field editor and to the fields themselves does not  work, the enabled field style overrides it. How can I retain the theme color for enable-condition-met fields?

I have a page with a number of tabs on it, they are displayed on the front end as a picklist for ease of use, but on the back end, I cannot reorder the tabs easily, they get jittery and jump around.  Is this a known issue?  Please see video below.https://cl.ly/231V0Q2m1I3x

I have a field editor which has checkbox field (ui-only field)When this checkbox is checked, I would like to disable fields in field editor (I have input text fields and picklist fields as well)I gave a dummy css name to fields in field editor .and tried something like : $(“.ca”).each(function(){                                this.disabled=true;                console.log(‘disabled . . .’);            });This didn’t work.Any ideas ?Thank You.K

Hi All,I have a ‘Controlling’ UI only field which I am using to set the value of another Status field.When the page loads how can I have the value of the Status field already populated in the ‘Controlling’ UI only field?The UI only field is RADIO buttonsThe Status field is a PICKLIST

Ok, so this isn’t directly related to Skuid development, but I’m hoping someone here has experienced a similar issue.Salesforce’s Call Center integration allows you to specify a custom VisualForce page as a screen pop. Unfortunately, while the user is working under the Skuid namespace (acme–skuid.na16.visual.force.com) this means the user is sent to acme--skuid.na16.visual.force.com/apex/OurCustomVFPage.That custom VF page isn’t available under the Skuid namespace, so Salesforce just throws a “That URL doesn’t exist” error.Does anyone know how to make our custom VF page available under the Skuid namespace?Thanks!Here is the question I’ve posted on the Salesforce forums.

I think I’m ready to take the dive into an advanced training course. When’s the next training event?

We are working in two sandbox environments, and have found that in our newer, partial sandbox (staging), that we often need to check the “Process Model client-side” box to get the pages to function the same as the initial sandbox. This is especially true when those models have conditions based on other models that are getting re-queried.Any idea why this would be different from one environment to the next? Recent update in Skuid? Other setting?Thanks,Seth

Hello, I’m trying to create a custom button on the Account page, non-skuid page, that will open a related page in edit mode. I have created a visualforce redirect page with this markup: <page standardcontroller="CEPdat__c" extensions="skuid.Redirects" showheader="false" sidebar="false" readonly doctype="html-5.0" action="%7B!IF(canUseSkuid,'',redirect)%7D" title="Edit {!CEPdat__c.Name}"> <page page="CEPred"></page> </page> my custom object’s api name is: CEPdat__c Any ideas of what the syntax would be for the Custom Button? I tried this syntax but it didn’t work: /{CEPdat\_\_c.Id}/e?retURL=%2F{Account.Id}%3Fcore.apexpages.devmode.url%3D1%26nooverride%3D1%26sfdc.override%3D1

Hey Team, I’m currently completely baffled about the following issue I’m currently having with some models. At a high level, what I’m aiming to do is Account Matching on a Lead detail page, if the Lead happens to be using our product. Here are the 3 SFDC objects/Skuid Models I’m working with and their relevant fields: Lead (Id field) Product_User__c (ProductUser is the Model name) (Lookups to Lead (Lead__c), Subscription__c, and Subscription__r.Account__c) Account (ProductUserAccounts is the Model name) I am displaying one Lead Id per page (Condition: Id = param(Id)), up to 20 Product User rows, and only one ProductUserAccount. A Product_User__c record does not have to lookup to the Lead, but it does have to look up to a Subscription. However, for a ProductUser row to show in Skuid, it does have to be associated to the Lead we are viewing (Condition: Lead__c = (Lead)(Id)). The Subscription (Subscription__c) that the ProductUser looks up to does not have to necessarily look up to an A

How do I reference the case number field within a case aggregate model when it is not available within the grouping selection? I am trying to following the instructions from the post “How do I create a link on field in an aggregate table?” We use the Case number to identify cases and I only see the Id, reference fields to other objects and pick lists. I am linking my case aggregate “EncountersAggDrillDown” model (see xml) to my case basic “EncounterCaseNumber” (see xml) to get the CaseNumber field. Within the table Encounters by Domain Drill (see xml) I attempted to create a template field with that would yield the case number referenced in the EncounterCaseNumber model. The template field code is: (field type=“COMBO” valuehalign=“”> Case Number <a href=“/{{{id}}}“target=”_blank”>{{{Model.EncounterCaseNumber.data.CaseNumber}}}</a> ) EncountersAggDrillDown Model 1 “EncounterCaseNumber” model “EncountersAggDrillDown” Encounter ID <a hr

In salesforce I have a global picklist with 50 items.  In a multi picklist I have 50 items to select from and in a second multi select picklist I only want to show 40 of the 50 as visible and selectable. Both of the mutiplicklists are using the same global picklist. Can this be done with Skuid?

I’m looking to find out how to do my conditions(i think) I have two models 1 is standard Opportunities  and other is a custom object, i’m am displaying data from the Opportunities and by default I am creating a new record for my custom object when saving data. What I am looking/wanting to do is by default with my custom object created a new record BUT if there is a related record that matches the Opportunity then display that row from the custom object with the data contained. Does this make since? FYI is the public force.com page.