Skip to main content

Is there a method of disconnecting a glossary term when it appears out of context?  TO  and CAN are used in our business for Traffic Officer and Commercial Advice Note.  sadly, “to” and “can” are frequently used in Task and Activity text and do not relate to the glossary terms in question, however, they will still be underlined because they are seen as a glossary term.

When such an issue occurs with a SYSTEM, they can be unlinked so they do not show. ie - we use software called Share and Confirm, but if these verbs are used in an task or activity description, they can be unlinked from the systems of the same name.

Why is a similar function not available with glossary terms?  It is causing us a real headache

We are suffering from this as well ,    not sure if you are aware of the ideas community page , as there is currently an idea for this feature to vote on .  

Nintex Ideas

 

We ourselves have worked around this by using a process reference adjacent to the glossary item title which we have found breaks the connection if the item can also  be a word .     Hope this helps 

We are suffering from this as well ,    not sure if you are aware of the ideas community page , as there is currently an idea for this feature to vote on .  

Nintex Ideas

 

We ourselves have worked around this by using a process reference adjacent to the glossary item title which we have found breaks the connection if the item can also  be a word .     Hope this helps 

Hi Claire - is this the idea you were referencing?

 

Hi it was this one - More control over glossary tagging | Nintex Ideas

Reply


View our Community Site Map

Nintex Community Sitemap
Terms & ConditionsCookie settings