Skip to main content

I’m recreating our Salesforce opportunity page in Skuid. The default Salesforce related lists “Open Activities” and “Activity History” include both tasks and events in one easy to read view so you can review the full history of client interaction.

I’m trying to replicate this in Skuid but from what I can see I have to have different tables for tasks and events. The obviously issue here is being able to clearly see when clients were contacted, what frequency etc etc as you have to go back and forth between two tables.

Has anyone else solved this or am I doing something wrong?

Thanks

You could create a custom component, but that would take a long time to get your desired functionality. This is what Salesforce has done. Pretty sure this related list on page layouts isn’t as customizable as most other related lists. Salesforce has done some super flexible related lists where they’ve had to create special objects/visualforce to display them on page layouts. Ie. Contact Roles, Notes & Attachments, & Google Docs, and in this case Tasks and Activities. Hopefully I’m wrong and there’s another easier way, because I’d like to see this functionality as well. Sounds like a new component would be in order. A multi object table component. Probably already an idea in the community.


The problem here is that Salesforce has a sObject call “Activity History” that combines these two objects.  But salesforce does not allow SOQL access to that object.  This means Skuid cannot access it.  We can get to Tasks and Events,  but not the combined object.  I know that Tasks and Events are some of the most highly used objects in Salesforce and so they probably have good reason to put these limits on.  Its the burden we accept to live in this multi-tenant environment.

You can put tasks and events together in a calendar.  That component accepts mutliple objects in separate event sources.

The calendar requires a date time field,  so you would either have to add a custom “due date” field, or build a formula that translated the due date into a date time field. 

Hopefully that explains the situation and gives you some workaround.  Sorry. 


Reply