Skip to main content

Hello,

 

I understand this question has been raised multiple times, but I'm still searching for a clear answer. In New Responsive Forms, repeating sections utilize GUIDs for data storage, unlike the "normal names" used in Classic Forms. Is there a method to transition away from using GUIDs for New Responsive Forms and make it in line with Classic Forms?

 

Please see the sample XML below:


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<RepeaterData>
    <Version>1.0</Version>
    <Items>
        <Item>
            <_eb34b7e7e3e148428d0bd9293b8f05c8 type="System.DateTime">2024-03-06T16:31:00.000Z</_eb34b7e7e3e148428d0bd9293b8f05c8>
            <_72d8b46e8fde4c4bb59ee79011b5b8c8 type="System.String">Hname</_72d8b46e8fde4c4bb59ee79011b5b8c8>
            <_fdd297a899cb40cbacb4eaea49b41fc5 type="System.String">123123</_fdd297a899cb40cbacb4eaea49b41fc5>
            <_6b4e3b9db84a4adf946dd831c4e45c66 type="System.String">213213</_6b4e3b9db84a4adf946dd831c4e45c66>
            <_d31078b194ac495ea838efeb6b9d64c9 type="System.String">321321</_d31078b194ac495ea838efeb6b9d64c9>
            <_b9ab27c8ee2b4a189e9ca921ac9577e4 type="System.String">333111</_b9ab27c8ee2b4a189e9ca921ac9577e4>
            <_d50eed9075dd4be4b89c2686a04610bf type="System.String">222111</_d50eed9075dd4be4b89c2686a04610bf>
            <_dd2e2b4d5fb349ee81c580c07c5b6a97 type="System.Boolean">True</_dd2e2b4d5fb349ee81c580c07c5b6a97>
            <_5aee027d2d9d4493974470eb9379a2e5 type="System.String">123123123</_5aee027d2d9d4493974470eb9379a2e5>
        </Item>
    </Items>
</RepeaterData>

Hi @Evgenii G. 

I did some quick testing and it doesn't appear that you can change the internal field names, I will ask around and see what I can find out for you. 

In meantime can I ask if it is for a specific use case or just for quality of life?

 

Jake 

Hi @Jake 

We have some workflows processing the XMLs from the Classic Forms. And we are migrating the forms from the classic to the new responsive designer. Ideally, we would like to use the same workflows with the New Responsive Forms, but if there is no way to change the XML element names, then we will have to do the extra work with the migration of the workflows as well.

Hi @Evgenii G. 

 

I agree, It is something I have come across before, I will see what I can find out for you. 

 

Jake

Reply


View our Community Site Map

Nintex Community Sitemap
Terms & ConditionsCookie settings