As mentioned previously, I'm new to the logic. In the solution that was suggested for one of the issues I’m having the “and” as part of the formula was used. Would “&&” and “and” be a valide form of the rule for Nintex?
"Solution shown below"
and(is edit mode,equals(my requester approver(display name),Current User(display name)))
If you could please look at my rules and help me with a rule that would be acceptable on the form providing a work around for the following two rules.
Please see attached for rules 36 Rules that didn’t work!!
How can I write the following two rules to work on my form?
Re: Violating the Rule of 2 Logical Arguments
Thank you. Would the != also not work because of the effort of using it in a nested function or would another format work?
Could I make two rules that would do the same outcome as the original rule?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Violating the Rule of 2 Logical Arguments
Hi,
You could try writing your rule like:
and(is edit mode,equals(my requester approver(display name),Current User(display name)))
Also the second rule will not work. The not() runtime function is designed to reverse the outcome of a rule in Nintex Forms. It cannot be nested inside other functions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Violating the Rule of 2 Logical Arguments
I'm new to the logic we can use when forming a condition for a rule.
It seems that whenever I add the && it doesn't work, and it causes my other rules on the form to stop working.
How would I make the following rule work?
