cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
bo55vxr
Nintex Newbie

Populate a PEOPLE field with Current User's Manager

Sorry for the apparent newbie question but I'm a .... newbie 

My form is basically a "request" form, using Responsive mode backed by a basic SharePoint Online custom list.

One of the fields in the list is the requester's Manager, with a type of People/Group.

On the form, I can obtain the manager using "userProfileLookup("Current User(email)", "Manager") but I just dont see how I can then push this into the SharePoint field.

If use a Calculated Field it does not allow me to "Connect to" the SharePoint field as it's not listed (incompatible types I guess)... but if I use a People field and set the Default value to a formula fn-UserProfileLookUp(Current User(email),"Manager") it shows an empty text box.

I'm sure it's something really simple but I just cant see it...

TYIA

Chris.

Tags (1)
0 Kudos
Reply
3 Replies
saharc
Nintex Newbie

Re: Populate a PEOPLE field with Current User's Manager

Hi,

The responsive form have advantages and disadvantages, I guess that the reason that you get blank textbox is that there is no operation "userProfileLookup" for "People" field so it's not recognize the action

But I can suggest workaround with you can use Nintex Workflow

You can add calculated value in the form that show Manager Display Name(so the user could see the manager)

When item created you can start WF that insert the initiator manager to any field you want including person field

I'm sure that must be better way than this...maybe other people could help

Regards,

Reply
bo55vxr
Nintex Newbie

Re: Populate a PEOPLE field with Current User's Manager

Yeah ... I think that's going to be the only option...

On the plus side, I need a WF to fire "on create" anyway, so I'll just add this as an extra step..

But, as you say, I'm sure there must be an easier way to do this.

0 Kudos
Reply
bo55vxr
Nintex Newbie

Re: Populate a PEOPLE field with Current User's Manager

Yeah ... I think that's going to be the only option...

On the plus side, I need a WF to fire "on create" anyway, so I'll just add this as an extra step..

But, as you say, I'm sure there must be an easier way to do this.

0 Kudos
Reply